Current and/or relevant? Some reflections on autonomy of scientific opinion based on experience of Serbian ethnology/ anthropology at the beginning of third millennium
Само за регистроване кориснике
2011
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
![](/themes/MirageDAIS//images/creativecommons/arr.png)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Autonomy of science and art is an ideal of every civilized society. The
distance between a certain society and this ideal depends on a large number of
parameters, among which cultural enlightenment and consciousness of the main
protagonists in realization of these two areas seem to be most important. Unfortunately, Serbia cannot boast with a high level of independency of creative
processes. Nowadays, in formal sense, they enjoy a higher level of autonomy in
terms of the state ideology; however, at the same time, they are essentially and
basically restricted by it. The very notion of autonomy here is related to fi nancial
and, more than this, to ideological independence of free and creative thought, that
is to the question to which extent scientifi c creativity manage to transcend current cultural-historical-social context and to fi nd universal regularities of human
civilization in it. Intensity of social changes and postmodern market ideologies
are refl ected both at offi ci...al scientifi c policy and at internal determination of context and concept of ethnological/anthropological researching which quite often
become trapped in the shallow of topicality.
Кључне речи:
autonomy of science / scientific policy / quantity / ethnology/anthropology / actuality / relevanceИзвор:
Český lid, 2011, 98, 3, 227-238Издавач:
- Prague : Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Верски и национални идентитет у визуелној култури новог века (RS-MESTD-MPN2006-2010-147016)
Институција/група
Етнографски институт САНУ / Institute of Ethnography SASATY - JOUR AU - Pavićević, Aleksandra PY - 2011 UR - https://www.jstor.org/stable/42640410 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/4815 AB - Autonomy of science and art is an ideal of every civilized society. The distance between a certain society and this ideal depends on a large number of parameters, among which cultural enlightenment and consciousness of the main protagonists in realization of these two areas seem to be most important. Unfortunately, Serbia cannot boast with a high level of independency of creative processes. Nowadays, in formal sense, they enjoy a higher level of autonomy in terms of the state ideology; however, at the same time, they are essentially and basically restricted by it. The very notion of autonomy here is related to fi nancial and, more than this, to ideological independence of free and creative thought, that is to the question to which extent scientifi c creativity manage to transcend current cultural-historical-social context and to fi nd universal regularities of human civilization in it. Intensity of social changes and postmodern market ideologies are refl ected both at offi cial scientifi c policy and at internal determination of context and concept of ethnological/anthropological researching which quite often become trapped in the shallow of topicality. PB - Prague : Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences T2 - Český lid T1 - Current and/or relevant? Some reflections on autonomy of scientific opinion based on experience of Serbian ethnology/ anthropology at the beginning of third millennium SP - 227 EP - 238 VL - 98 IS - 3 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4815 ER -
@article{ author = "Pavićević, Aleksandra", year = "2011", abstract = "Autonomy of science and art is an ideal of every civilized society. The distance between a certain society and this ideal depends on a large number of parameters, among which cultural enlightenment and consciousness of the main protagonists in realization of these two areas seem to be most important. Unfortunately, Serbia cannot boast with a high level of independency of creative processes. Nowadays, in formal sense, they enjoy a higher level of autonomy in terms of the state ideology; however, at the same time, they are essentially and basically restricted by it. The very notion of autonomy here is related to fi nancial and, more than this, to ideological independence of free and creative thought, that is to the question to which extent scientifi c creativity manage to transcend current cultural-historical-social context and to fi nd universal regularities of human civilization in it. Intensity of social changes and postmodern market ideologies are refl ected both at offi cial scientifi c policy and at internal determination of context and concept of ethnological/anthropological researching which quite often become trapped in the shallow of topicality.", publisher = "Prague : Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences", journal = "Český lid", title = "Current and/or relevant? Some reflections on autonomy of scientific opinion based on experience of Serbian ethnology/ anthropology at the beginning of third millennium", pages = "227-238", volume = "98", number = "3", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4815" }
Pavićević, A.. (2011). Current and/or relevant? Some reflections on autonomy of scientific opinion based on experience of Serbian ethnology/ anthropology at the beginning of third millennium. in Český lid Prague : Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences., 98(3), 227-238. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4815
Pavićević A. Current and/or relevant? Some reflections on autonomy of scientific opinion based on experience of Serbian ethnology/ anthropology at the beginning of third millennium. in Český lid. 2011;98(3):227-238. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4815 .
Pavićević, Aleksandra, "Current and/or relevant? Some reflections on autonomy of scientific opinion based on experience of Serbian ethnology/ anthropology at the beginning of third millennium" in Český lid, 98, no. 3 (2011):227-238, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4815 .