Значење као »позитивна« вредност у језику
Meaning as a “Positive” Value in Language
Poglavlje u monografiji (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
The study relies on Ferdinand de Saussure's theory of the sign and the prevalence of negative values in language, as well as the attitude that "meaning = a different value’. Drawing on the insights presented in the studies of Prof. Radoje Simić, we raise the possibility of a fundamental difference between meaning as the basic (positive / defined) value of the sign, and the values in language that result from the relations with units belonging to the lower logical rank of the same semantic circle. This ts illustrated by the example of the noun čovek (man) ( Palaeo-Slavic *čelovék), the primary and basic meaning of which is revealed in the etymological and syllogistic approach to this word / term. This approach reveals the existence of a primary syllogistic structure "čelovek" (man) (not a man) - *live (‘a living creature), where, based on the proposition *čelovék» and its contradiction ‘Hé celovékb, the conclusion "čelovek" is reached. The ‘human being’ is thereby determined biologicall...y (as a ‘living creature’), i.e. it is identified and comprehended as a distinct species of individuals in the genus (or the complex?) ‘live. As the ‘human being’ is defined as čelovék, and the human (social, humane) dimension of the man is inseparable from the biological dimension, the value ‘human being / individual / person’ must be
automatically assigned to MAN as its basic meaning.
When the Čovek (MAN) is observed as a biological being and is brought into relationship
with žena (woman), i.e. reduced to a lower logical level, the noun man is assigned a value dependent on the value of the noun woman. Seen as the woman's (‘a female person from the time .
she gets sexually mature and becomes a woman - she ceases to be a girl, she gets married, she
gives birth) reflection in a mirror, the man is assigned the value of ‘a male from the time he matures into a man (ceases to be a boy, gets married) until his old age. With some modifications
or reductions, this value is retained in the relationship between all units that belong to the same
circle and level (woman | man - MAN, woman | man — child, young man \ old man - man, etc.).
Полазећи од Сосирових погледа на вредност и значење у језику и следећи трагове увида изнетих у радовима проф. Радоја Симића, указујемо на могуће постојање суштинске разлике између основне вредности знака, којој одговара термин значење, и вредности које у језику настају као резултат релација међу речима одређеног семантичког круга. Те се разлике илуструју на примеру именице човек, у чијем се семантичком склопу издваја (1) примарно значење с основним, и (2) вредности које условљава релација са ‘жена’ (поткласа класе ‘женско’).
Ključne reči:
Sign; Meaning; Value; Man; clAsses ‘Female’ and ‘Male’; Subclasses ‘Woman’ and ‘Man’; Ferdinand de Saussure; Radoje Simić / знак; значење; вредност; човек; класе ‘женско’ и ‘мушко’; поткласе ‘жена’ и ‘човек’; Фердинанд де Сосир; Радоје СимићIzvor:
Научни доприноси Радоја Симића : зборник радова, 2018, 299-312Izdavač:
- Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет
TY - CHAP AU - Радић, Јованка Ј. PY - 2018 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/10411 AB - The study relies on Ferdinand de Saussure's theory of the sign and the prevalence of negative values in language, as well as the attitude that "meaning = a different value’. Drawing on the insights presented in the studies of Prof. Radoje Simić, we raise the possibility of a fundamental difference between meaning as the basic (positive / defined) value of the sign, and the values in language that result from the relations with units belonging to the lower logical rank of the same semantic circle. This ts illustrated by the example of the noun čovek (man) ( Palaeo-Slavic *čelovék), the primary and basic meaning of which is revealed in the etymological and syllogistic approach to this word / term. This approach reveals the existence of a primary syllogistic structure "čelovek" (man) (not a man) - *live (‘a living creature), where, based on the proposition *čelovék» and its contradiction ‘Hé celovékb, the conclusion "čelovek" is reached. The ‘human being’ is thereby determined biologically (as a ‘living creature’), i.e. it is identified and comprehended as a distinct species of individuals in the genus (or the complex?) ‘live. As the ‘human being’ is defined as čelovék, and the human (social, humane) dimension of the man is inseparable from the biological dimension, the value ‘human being / individual / person’ must be automatically assigned to MAN as its basic meaning. When the Čovek (MAN) is observed as a biological being and is brought into relationship with žena (woman), i.e. reduced to a lower logical level, the noun man is assigned a value dependent on the value of the noun woman. Seen as the woman's (‘a female person from the time . she gets sexually mature and becomes a woman - she ceases to be a girl, she gets married, she gives birth) reflection in a mirror, the man is assigned the value of ‘a male from the time he matures into a man (ceases to be a boy, gets married) until his old age. With some modifications or reductions, this value is retained in the relationship between all units that belong to the same circle and level (woman | man - MAN, woman | man — child, young man \ old man - man, etc.). AB - Полазећи од Сосирових погледа на вредност и значење у језику и следећи трагове увида изнетих у радовима проф. Радоја Симића, указујемо на могуће постојање суштинске разлике између основне вредности знака, којој одговара термин значење, и вредности које у језику настају као резултат релација међу речима одређеног семантичког круга. Те се разлике илуструју на примеру именице човек, у чијем се семантичком склопу издваја (1) примарно значење с основним, и (2) вредности које условљава релација са ‘жена’ (поткласа класе ‘женско’). PB - Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет T2 - Научни доприноси Радоја Симића : зборник радова T1 - Значење као »позитивна« вредност у језику T1 - Meaning as a “Positive” Value in Language SP - 299 EP - 312 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_10411 ER -
@inbook{ author = "Радић, Јованка Ј.", year = "2018", abstract = "The study relies on Ferdinand de Saussure's theory of the sign and the prevalence of negative values in language, as well as the attitude that "meaning = a different value’. Drawing on the insights presented in the studies of Prof. Radoje Simić, we raise the possibility of a fundamental difference between meaning as the basic (positive / defined) value of the sign, and the values in language that result from the relations with units belonging to the lower logical rank of the same semantic circle. This ts illustrated by the example of the noun čovek (man) ( Palaeo-Slavic *čelovék), the primary and basic meaning of which is revealed in the etymological and syllogistic approach to this word / term. This approach reveals the existence of a primary syllogistic structure "čelovek" (man) (not a man) - *live (‘a living creature), where, based on the proposition *čelovék» and its contradiction ‘Hé celovékb, the conclusion "čelovek" is reached. The ‘human being’ is thereby determined biologically (as a ‘living creature’), i.e. it is identified and comprehended as a distinct species of individuals in the genus (or the complex?) ‘live. As the ‘human being’ is defined as čelovék, and the human (social, humane) dimension of the man is inseparable from the biological dimension, the value ‘human being / individual / person’ must be automatically assigned to MAN as its basic meaning. When the Čovek (MAN) is observed as a biological being and is brought into relationship with žena (woman), i.e. reduced to a lower logical level, the noun man is assigned a value dependent on the value of the noun woman. Seen as the woman's (‘a female person from the time . she gets sexually mature and becomes a woman - she ceases to be a girl, she gets married, she gives birth) reflection in a mirror, the man is assigned the value of ‘a male from the time he matures into a man (ceases to be a boy, gets married) until his old age. With some modifications or reductions, this value is retained in the relationship between all units that belong to the same circle and level (woman | man - MAN, woman | man — child, young man \ old man - man, etc.)., Полазећи од Сосирових погледа на вредност и значење у језику и следећи трагове увида изнетих у радовима проф. Радоја Симића, указујемо на могуће постојање суштинске разлике између основне вредности знака, којој одговара термин значење, и вредности које у језику настају као резултат релација међу речима одређеног семантичког круга. Те се разлике илуструју на примеру именице човек, у чијем се семантичком склопу издваја (1) примарно значење с основним, и (2) вредности које условљава релација са ‘жена’ (поткласа класе ‘женско’).", publisher = "Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет", journal = "Научни доприноси Радоја Симића : зборник радова", booktitle = "Значење као »позитивна« вредност у језику, Meaning as a “Positive” Value in Language", pages = "299-312", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_10411" }
Радић, Ј. Ј.. (2018). Значење као »позитивна« вредност у језику. in Научни доприноси Радоја Симића : зборник радова Крагујевац : Филолошко-уметнички факултет., 299-312. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_10411
Радић ЈЈ. Значење као »позитивна« вредност у језику. in Научни доприноси Радоја Симића : зборник радова. 2018;:299-312. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_10411 .
Радић, Јованка Ј., "Значење као »позитивна« вредност у језику" in Научни доприноси Радоја Симића : зборник радова (2018):299-312, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_10411 .