DAIS - Digital Archive of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DAIS
  • Cрпска академија наука и уметности / Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Глас САНУ / Glas SANU
  • Глас Одељења историјских наука / Glas - Academie serbe des sciences et des arts. Classe des sciences historiques
  • View Item
  •   DAIS
  • Cрпска академија наука и уметности / Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Глас САНУ / Glas SANU
  • Глас Одељења историјских наука / Glas - Academie serbe des sciences et des arts. Classe des sciences historiques
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Нови ревизионизам и стари стереотипи? Историографија о Србима и Србији нкон 1991. године

New revisionism and оld stereotypes? On post-1991 historiography on Serbs and Serbia

Thumbnail
2018
bitstream_38489.pdf (1.239Mb)
Authors
Батаковић, Душан Т.
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Reading through historical studies on Serbs and Serbia written during and after the wars of the Yugoslav succession (1991–1999) reveals many elements of a biased, one-sided narrative derived from various sources. This contribution looks at the ideological and nationalistic writings on “Greater Serbia”, “Greater Serbian nationalists”, “Serbian hegemony” produced by Croatian nationalists in interwar Yugoslavia and by Croatian Second World War émigrés, who were markedly anti-Yugoslav both in the monarchic and communist period and whose perspective has gained ground in Western Europe and the USA. These writings are often compatible with Albanian historiography produced under the Stalinist regime of Enver Hoxha. This simplistic and biased perception of the Serbs as endemic nationalists, communists and anti-Europeans, allegedly keen on establishing complete hegemony over other nations and minorities in Yugoslavia, has reappeared since 1991 not only in mass media but also in much of We...stern scholarship, strongly influenced by a black-and-white perspective on the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Such approach, fostered by some scholars from the former Yugoslavia, chime perfectly with the old stereotypes inherited from Austrian and German historiography on Kriegsschuldfrage which have found their way into American historiography in the post-1945 period. Many controversial interpretations (Noel Malcolm, Holm Sundhaussen, Tim Judah, James Gow, Robert Donia, Branimir Anzulovic, Stjepan Meštrović, Philip Cohen, Marcus Tanner, Sabrina Ramet etc.), have been designed to support some immediate political goals or geopolitical claims and have little to do with scholarship and intellectual rigour. Yet, many such works have become standard and wide-spread, albeit stereotyped, perception of the Serbs and their history in the Balkans.

Keywords:
Serbia / historiography / historical revisionism
Source:
Глас САНУ, 2018, 428, 149-171
Publisher:
  • Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
Note:
  • Глас / Српска академија наука и уметности ; 428. Одељење историјских наука ; књ.18

Cobiss ID: 1547641322

ISSN: 0351-4765

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9059
URI
https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/9059
Collections
  • Глас Одељења историјских наука / Glas - Academie serbe des sciences et des arts. Classe des sciences historiques
Institution/Community
Cрпска академија наука и уметности / Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Батаковић, Душан Т.
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/9059
AB  - Reading through historical studies on Serbs and Serbia written during and after the
wars of the Yugoslav succession (1991–1999) reveals many elements of a biased, one-sided narrative derived from various sources. This contribution looks at the ideological and
nationalistic writings on “Greater Serbia”, “Greater Serbian nationalists”, “Serbian hegemony” produced by Croatian nationalists in interwar Yugoslavia and by Croatian Second
World War émigrés, who were markedly anti-Yugoslav both in the monarchic and communist period and whose perspective has gained ground in Western Europe and the USA.
These writings are often compatible with Albanian historiography produced under the
Stalinist regime of Enver Hoxha. This simplistic and biased perception of the Serbs as
endemic nationalists, communists and anti-Europeans, allegedly keen on establishing complete hegemony over other nations and minorities in Yugoslavia, has reappeared since 1991
not only in mass media but also in much of Western scholarship, strongly influenced by a
black-and-white perspective on the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Such approach, fostered by
some scholars from the former Yugoslavia, chime perfectly with the old stereotypes inherited from Austrian and German historiography on Kriegsschuldfrage which have found
their way into American historiography in the post-1945 period. Many controversial interpretations (Noel Malcolm, Holm Sundhaussen, Tim Judah, James Gow, Robert Donia,
Branimir Anzulovic, Stjepan Meštrović, Philip Cohen, Marcus Tanner, Sabrina Ramet
etc.), have been designed to support some immediate political goals or geopolitical claims
and have little to do with scholarship and intellectual rigour. Yet, many such works have
become standard and wide-spread, albeit stereotyped, perception of the Serbs and their
history in the Balkans.
PB  - Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
T2  - Глас САНУ
T1  - Нови ревизионизам и стари стереотипи? Историографија о Србима и Србији нкон 1991. године
T1  - New revisionism and оld stereotypes? On post-1991 historiography on Serbs and Serbia
SP  - 149
EP  - 171
VL  - 428
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9059
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Батаковић, Душан Т.",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Reading through historical studies on Serbs and Serbia written during and after the
wars of the Yugoslav succession (1991–1999) reveals many elements of a biased, one-sided narrative derived from various sources. This contribution looks at the ideological and
nationalistic writings on “Greater Serbia”, “Greater Serbian nationalists”, “Serbian hegemony” produced by Croatian nationalists in interwar Yugoslavia and by Croatian Second
World War émigrés, who were markedly anti-Yugoslav both in the monarchic and communist period and whose perspective has gained ground in Western Europe and the USA.
These writings are often compatible with Albanian historiography produced under the
Stalinist regime of Enver Hoxha. This simplistic and biased perception of the Serbs as
endemic nationalists, communists and anti-Europeans, allegedly keen on establishing complete hegemony over other nations and minorities in Yugoslavia, has reappeared since 1991
not only in mass media but also in much of Western scholarship, strongly influenced by a
black-and-white perspective on the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Such approach, fostered by
some scholars from the former Yugoslavia, chime perfectly with the old stereotypes inherited from Austrian and German historiography on Kriegsschuldfrage which have found
their way into American historiography in the post-1945 period. Many controversial interpretations (Noel Malcolm, Holm Sundhaussen, Tim Judah, James Gow, Robert Donia,
Branimir Anzulovic, Stjepan Meštrović, Philip Cohen, Marcus Tanner, Sabrina Ramet
etc.), have been designed to support some immediate political goals or geopolitical claims
and have little to do with scholarship and intellectual rigour. Yet, many such works have
become standard and wide-spread, albeit stereotyped, perception of the Serbs and their
history in the Balkans.",
publisher = "Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности",
journal = "Глас САНУ",
title = "Нови ревизионизам и стари стереотипи? Историографија о Србима и Србији нкон 1991. године, New revisionism and оld stereotypes? On post-1991 historiography on Serbs and Serbia",
pages = "149-171",
volume = "428",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9059"
}
Батаковић, Д. Т.. (2018). Нови ревизионизам и стари стереотипи? Историографија о Србима и Србији нкон 1991. године. in Глас САНУ
Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности., 428, 149-171.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9059
Батаковић ДТ. Нови ревизионизам и стари стереотипи? Историографија о Србима и Србији нкон 1991. године. in Глас САНУ. 2018;428:149-171.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9059 .
Батаковић, Душан Т., "Нови ревизионизам и стари стереотипи? Историографија о Србима и Србији нкон 1991. године" in Глас САНУ, 428 (2018):149-171,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9059 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About DAIS - Digital Archive of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts | Send Feedback

CoreTrustSealre3dataOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About DAIS - Digital Archive of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts | Send Feedback

CoreTrustSealre3dataOpenAIRERCUB