О облицима компаратива придева низак
On the Comparative Forms of Adjective nizak
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
У чланку се, са лингвистичког и нормативистичког аспекта, говори о дублетном компаративу придева низак — нижи и нискији — и констатује да нема
принципских препрека за прихватање и другога наведеног облика у књижевни језик (уз евентуалну семантичку диференцијацију).
Author is analyzing the linguistic and distribution conditions of appearance
of adjectival comparative from niskiji instead of niži, or the parallel use of first
one with the latter. The linguistic conditions are connected narrowly with the semantic ones, since the analyzed form niskiji occurs with the meaning of moral quality, not the physical one: I one se osetio odmah bolje i — niskiji (= And at once he felt better, and — теaner). Вy author's opinion, the distribution conditions are
based on the lexical „rule“, i.e. on the rule of „individual case“ and on the support of a large number of forms like krepkiji, lјирkiji, krotkiji, ubogiji, which re
placed the archaic forms: krepčiji, lјирčiji, kročiji, иbožiji, what was stated already
in grammars. As the problem of standardization is concerned in the case of form
niskiji as a parallel form with the form niži, author does not see any serious obstacle in accepting it in standard language.
Keywords:
придев 'низак' / облици компаратива / дистрибуција / семантичка диференцијација / нормативни статус / adjective 'nizak' / comparative forms / distribution / semantic differentiation / normative statusSource:
Наш језик, 1999, 33, 1-2Publisher:
- Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ
Collections
Institution/Community
Институт за српски језик САНУ / Institute for the Serbian Language of SASATY - JOUR AU - Станојчић, Живојин PY - 1999 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/7752 AB - У чланку се, са лингвистичког и нормативистичког аспекта, говори о дублетном компаративу придева низак — нижи и нискији — и констатује да нема принципских препрека за прихватање и другога наведеног облика у књижевни језик (уз евентуалну семантичку диференцијацију). AB - Author is analyzing the linguistic and distribution conditions of appearance of adjectival comparative from niskiji instead of niži, or the parallel use of first one with the latter. The linguistic conditions are connected narrowly with the semantic ones, since the analyzed form niskiji occurs with the meaning of moral quality, not the physical one: I one se osetio odmah bolje i — niskiji (= And at once he felt better, and — теaner). Вy author's opinion, the distribution conditions are based on the lexical „rule“, i.e. on the rule of „individual case“ and on the support of a large number of forms like krepkiji, lјирkiji, krotkiji, ubogiji, which re placed the archaic forms: krepčiji, lјирčiji, kročiji, иbožiji, what was stated already in grammars. As the problem of standardization is concerned in the case of form niskiji as a parallel form with the form niži, author does not see any serious obstacle in accepting it in standard language. PB - Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ T2 - Наш језик T1 - О облицима компаратива придева низак T1 - On the Comparative Forms of Adjective nizak VL - 33 VL - 36 IS - 1-2 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7752 ER -
@article{ author = "Станојчић, Живојин", year = "1999", abstract = "У чланку се, са лингвистичког и нормативистичког аспекта, говори о дублетном компаративу придева низак — нижи и нискији — и констатује да нема принципских препрека за прихватање и другога наведеног облика у књижевни језик (уз евентуалну семантичку диференцијацију)., Author is analyzing the linguistic and distribution conditions of appearance of adjectival comparative from niskiji instead of niži, or the parallel use of first one with the latter. The linguistic conditions are connected narrowly with the semantic ones, since the analyzed form niskiji occurs with the meaning of moral quality, not the physical one: I one se osetio odmah bolje i — niskiji (= And at once he felt better, and — теaner). Вy author's opinion, the distribution conditions are based on the lexical „rule“, i.e. on the rule of „individual case“ and on the support of a large number of forms like krepkiji, lјирkiji, krotkiji, ubogiji, which re placed the archaic forms: krepčiji, lјирčiji, kročiji, иbožiji, what was stated already in grammars. As the problem of standardization is concerned in the case of form niskiji as a parallel form with the form niži, author does not see any serious obstacle in accepting it in standard language.", publisher = "Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ", journal = "Наш језик", title = "О облицима компаратива придева низак, On the Comparative Forms of Adjective nizak", volume = "33, 36", number = "1-2", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7752" }
Станојчић, Ж.. (1999). О облицима компаратива придева низак. in Наш језик Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ., 33(1-2). https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7752
Станојчић Ж. О облицима компаратива придева низак. in Наш језик. 1999;33(1-2). https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7752 .
Станојчић, Живојин, "О облицима компаратива придева низак" in Наш језик, 33, no. 1-2 (1999), https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7752 .