Дискурс инструкција – између когнитивне и антрополошке лингвистике
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
У раду се применом теоријско-методолошких приступа антрополошке и когнитивне лингвистике анализира корпус дискурса инструкција (КДИ) настао на основу теренских антрополингвистичких разговора
на тему традицијске културе. Инструкције се истражују као елемент
описивања ситуација које подразумевају устаљени редослед радњи, и
итерабилност. Анализа КДИ-ја је указала на доминантну употребу другог
лица једнине презента за давање инструкција и скренула пажњу на дијалекатску употребу другог лица једнине футура првог у истој функцији.
In this paper, the discourse of instructions corpus (DIC), composed of Bunjevac speech, Kosovo-Resava and Prizren-Timok dialects, spoken in a wide
area in Serbia, was applied theoretical and methodological approaches common
to anthropological and cognitive linguistics in order to demonstrate the mechanism according to which giving instructions functions in a specific oral speech. Based on the analysis of DIC, we came to the conclusion that instructions
are given in cases of describing situations which involve an established sequence of events (or actions) that must be followed, and which contains elements
of iterations (repeatability), which excludes giving instructions for unique and
individual events and actions, such as biographical stories, historical events,
personal and family history and so on. Taking into account this analysis, the
thematic inventory of instructions proved to be significantly larger in relation
to the inventory of instructions which the linguists have d...ealt with so far. The
analysis of examples from DIC showed that the typical linguistic means for
giving instructions is the second person singular of the present tense, which
indicates the speaker’s awareness of the existence of the recipient (researchers)
of the research situation, which does not mean that the researcher 1s also the recipient of instructions given in field interviews.
Keywords:
инструкције / instructions / discourse analysis / anthropological linguistics / cognitive linguistics / dialects / comparable corpora/ texts / дискурс анализа / антрополошка лингвистика / когнитивна лингвистика / дијалекти / упоредиви корпуси/текстовиSource:
Јужнословенски филолог, 2014, 70, 207-223Publisher:
- Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ
Funding / projects:
- Language, folklore, migrations in the Balkans (RS-178010)
Collections
Institution/Community
Институт за српски језик САНУ / Institute for the Serbian Language of SASATY - JOUR AU - Ћирковић, Светлана М. PY - 2014 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/6385 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/6400 AB - У раду се применом теоријско-методолошких приступа антрополошке и когнитивне лингвистике анализира корпус дискурса инструкција (КДИ) настао на основу теренских антрополингвистичких разговора на тему традицијске културе. Инструкције се истражују као елемент описивања ситуација које подразумевају устаљени редослед радњи, и итерабилност. Анализа КДИ-ја је указала на доминантну употребу другог лица једнине презента за давање инструкција и скренула пажњу на дијалекатску употребу другог лица једнине футура првог у истој функцији. AB - In this paper, the discourse of instructions corpus (DIC), composed of Bunjevac speech, Kosovo-Resava and Prizren-Timok dialects, spoken in a wide area in Serbia, was applied theoretical and methodological approaches common to anthropological and cognitive linguistics in order to demonstrate the mechanism according to which giving instructions functions in a specific oral speech. Based on the analysis of DIC, we came to the conclusion that instructions are given in cases of describing situations which involve an established sequence of events (or actions) that must be followed, and which contains elements of iterations (repeatability), which excludes giving instructions for unique and individual events and actions, such as biographical stories, historical events, personal and family history and so on. Taking into account this analysis, the thematic inventory of instructions proved to be significantly larger in relation to the inventory of instructions which the linguists have dealt with so far. The analysis of examples from DIC showed that the typical linguistic means for giving instructions is the second person singular of the present tense, which indicates the speaker’s awareness of the existence of the recipient (researchers) of the research situation, which does not mean that the researcher 1s also the recipient of instructions given in field interviews. PB - Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ T2 - Јужнословенски филолог T1 - Дискурс инструкција – између когнитивне и антрополошке лингвистике SP - 207 EP - 223 VL - 70 DO - 10.2298/JFI1470207C UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6400 ER -
@article{ author = "Ћирковић, Светлана М.", year = "2014", abstract = "У раду се применом теоријско-методолошких приступа антрополошке и когнитивне лингвистике анализира корпус дискурса инструкција (КДИ) настао на основу теренских антрополингвистичких разговора на тему традицијске културе. Инструкције се истражују као елемент описивања ситуација које подразумевају устаљени редослед радњи, и итерабилност. Анализа КДИ-ја је указала на доминантну употребу другог лица једнине презента за давање инструкција и скренула пажњу на дијалекатску употребу другог лица једнине футура првог у истој функцији., In this paper, the discourse of instructions corpus (DIC), composed of Bunjevac speech, Kosovo-Resava and Prizren-Timok dialects, spoken in a wide area in Serbia, was applied theoretical and methodological approaches common to anthropological and cognitive linguistics in order to demonstrate the mechanism according to which giving instructions functions in a specific oral speech. Based on the analysis of DIC, we came to the conclusion that instructions are given in cases of describing situations which involve an established sequence of events (or actions) that must be followed, and which contains elements of iterations (repeatability), which excludes giving instructions for unique and individual events and actions, such as biographical stories, historical events, personal and family history and so on. Taking into account this analysis, the thematic inventory of instructions proved to be significantly larger in relation to the inventory of instructions which the linguists have dealt with so far. The analysis of examples from DIC showed that the typical linguistic means for giving instructions is the second person singular of the present tense, which indicates the speaker’s awareness of the existence of the recipient (researchers) of the research situation, which does not mean that the researcher 1s also the recipient of instructions given in field interviews.", publisher = "Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ", journal = "Јужнословенски филолог", title = "Дискурс инструкција – између когнитивне и антрополошке лингвистике", pages = "207-223", volume = "70", doi = "10.2298/JFI1470207C", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6400" }
Ћирковић, С. М.. (2014). Дискурс инструкција – између когнитивне и антрополошке лингвистике. in Јужнословенски филолог Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ., 70, 207-223. https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI1470207C https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6400
Ћирковић СМ. Дискурс инструкција – између когнитивне и антрополошке лингвистике. in Јужнословенски филолог. 2014;70:207-223. doi:10.2298/JFI1470207C https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6400 .
Ћирковић, Светлана М., "Дискурс инструкција – између когнитивне и антрополошке лингвистике" in Јужнословенски филолог, 70 (2014):207-223, https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI1470207C ., https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6400 .