Поставке Стојана Новаковића о хронографу-тројадику у светлости савремених истраживања

Abstract

У раду се разматрају хронографски списи из Богишићевог зборника у којима је Стојан Новаковић видео траг српске компилације што је претходила Руском хронографу из 1512. године. Пошто се најпре његово мишљење приказује на фону њему сaвремене литературе, пружа се преглед новијих поставки о настанку хронографа, као и самог Зборника. Такође се указује и на интерпретације појма тројадик које проистичу из рукописне историје српских хронографа.

Stojan Novaković’s postulates about chronographs are situated in modern literary- historical circumstances. Results of review of manuscript which was Novaković’s starting point (Collection of Valtazar Bogišić in Cavtat, br. 19c) are shown. It was established that this is a collection-convolute of two scribes. One of them worked in the third quarter of the 16th century, and the other one in the first decade of the 17th century. Textological analysis showed that, contrary to Novaković’s opinion, articles about Serbs and Bulgarians from the second part belong to the tradition of Russian chronographs which were not divided into chapters, and that the present the earliest manuscript which was created during its Serbian reception. It is also pointed to the fact that, in manuscript history of Serbian chronographs use of the word troyadik was not uniform. In it, through various identifications of the “three empires”, various historiosophical concepts are reflected. Generally speaking, it turned out that Novaković’s postulates about chronograph-troyadik or chronograph of three empires did not stand the test of time.