DAIS - Digital Archive of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DAIS
  • Географски институт „Јован Цвијић“ САНУ / Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijić SASA
  • ГИ САНУ - Радови истраживача / GI SASA - Researchers' publications
  • View Item
  •   DAIS
  • Географски институт „Јован Цвијић“ САНУ / Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijić SASA
  • ГИ САНУ - Радови истраживача / GI SASA - Researchers' publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Global Geopark and Candidate – Comparative Analysis of Papuk Mountain Geopark (Croatia) and Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) by using GAM Model

Authorized Users Only
2013
Authors
Petrović, Marko D.
Vasiljević, Đorđije A.
Vujičić, Miroslav D.
Hose, Thomas A.
Marković, Slobodan B.
Lukić, Tin
Article (Published version)
,
Earth and Environmental Team
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
We examined the comparison of geoheritage resources of two natural protected areas: National park Fruška Gora in Serbia and Nature Park Papuk in Croatia. The first one has applied for UNESCO geopark recognition in 2007, while the second one was proclaimed as one the same year. The general hypothesis is that these two geologically similar areas possess comparable geo-resources, which should clarify the causes because of which Fruška Gora still has not been included in geopark network. For their comparison, authors applied previously created Geosite Assessment Model (GAM). GAM consists of two key indicators: Main and Additional Values, which are further divided into 12 and 15 indicators respectively, each individually marked from 0 to 1. This division is made due to two general kinds of values: Main - that are mostly generated by geosite’s natural characteristics; and Additional - that are mostly human-induced and generated by modifications for its use by visitors. The study revealed tha...t the Main Values are similar to both, Fruška Gora and Papuk. However, Papuk Mountain, as a well developed global geopark, has higher Additional Values, with significant international recognition. As these two investigated areas are less than 200 km away from each other, one of the development options could be collaboration of these complementary geotourism destinations through an international and mutual offer that could initiate new geo-destinations and further improve and develop conservation and promotion of geoheritage in a much wider region.

Keywords:
geopark / geoheritage / geotourism / Papuk Mt. / Fruška Gora Mt. / GAM Model
Source:
Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 8, 1, 105-116
Publisher:
  • Baia Mare : North University of Baia Mare
Funding / projects:
  • Transformation of Serbian Geospace - lessons from the past, contemporary problems and possible solutions (RS-176020)

ISSN: 1842-4090 (Print); 1844-489X (Online)

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_1085
URI
http://www.ubm.ro/sites/CJEES/viewTopic.php?topicId=300
https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/1085
Collections
  • ГИ САНУ - Радови истраживача / GI SASA - Researchers' publications
Institution/Community
Географски институт „Јован Цвијић“ САНУ / Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijić SASA
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Petrović, Marko D.
AU  - Vasiljević, Đorđije A.
AU  - Vujičić, Miroslav D.
AU  - Hose, Thomas A.
AU  - Marković, Slobodan B.
AU  - Lukić, Tin
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://www.ubm.ro/sites/CJEES/viewTopic.php?topicId=300
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/1085
AB  - We examined the comparison of geoheritage resources of two natural protected areas: National park Fruška Gora in Serbia and Nature Park Papuk in Croatia. The first one has applied for UNESCO geopark recognition in 2007, while the second one was proclaimed as one the same year. The general hypothesis is that these two geologically similar areas possess comparable geo-resources, which should clarify the causes because of which Fruška Gora still has not been included in geopark network. For their comparison, authors applied previously created Geosite Assessment Model (GAM). GAM consists of two key indicators: Main and Additional Values, which are further divided into 12 and 15 indicators respectively, each individually marked from 0 to 1. This division is made due to two general kinds of values: Main - that are mostly generated by geosite’s natural characteristics; and Additional - that are mostly human-induced and generated by modifications for its use by visitors. The study revealed that the Main Values are similar to both, Fruška Gora and Papuk. However, Papuk Mountain, as a well developed global geopark, has higher Additional Values, with significant international recognition. As these two investigated areas are less than 200 km away from each other, one of the development options could be collaboration of these complementary geotourism destinations through an international and mutual offer that could initiate new geo-destinations and further improve and develop conservation and promotion of geoheritage in a much wider region.
PB  - Baia Mare : North University of Baia Mare
T2  - Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences
T1  - Global Geopark and Candidate – Comparative Analysis of Papuk Mountain Geopark (Croatia) and Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) by using GAM Model
SP  - 105
EP  - 116
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_1085
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Petrović, Marko D. and Vasiljević, Đorđije A. and Vujičić, Miroslav D. and Hose, Thomas A. and Marković, Slobodan B. and Lukić, Tin",
year = "2013",
abstract = "We examined the comparison of geoheritage resources of two natural protected areas: National park Fruška Gora in Serbia and Nature Park Papuk in Croatia. The first one has applied for UNESCO geopark recognition in 2007, while the second one was proclaimed as one the same year. The general hypothesis is that these two geologically similar areas possess comparable geo-resources, which should clarify the causes because of which Fruška Gora still has not been included in geopark network. For their comparison, authors applied previously created Geosite Assessment Model (GAM). GAM consists of two key indicators: Main and Additional Values, which are further divided into 12 and 15 indicators respectively, each individually marked from 0 to 1. This division is made due to two general kinds of values: Main - that are mostly generated by geosite’s natural characteristics; and Additional - that are mostly human-induced and generated by modifications for its use by visitors. The study revealed that the Main Values are similar to both, Fruška Gora and Papuk. However, Papuk Mountain, as a well developed global geopark, has higher Additional Values, with significant international recognition. As these two investigated areas are less than 200 km away from each other, one of the development options could be collaboration of these complementary geotourism destinations through an international and mutual offer that could initiate new geo-destinations and further improve and develop conservation and promotion of geoheritage in a much wider region.",
publisher = "Baia Mare : North University of Baia Mare",
journal = "Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences",
title = "Global Geopark and Candidate – Comparative Analysis of Papuk Mountain Geopark (Croatia) and Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) by using GAM Model",
pages = "105-116",
volume = "8",
number = "1",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_1085"
}
Petrović, M. D., Vasiljević, Đ. A., Vujičić, M. D., Hose, T. A., Marković, S. B.,& Lukić, T.. (2013). Global Geopark and Candidate – Comparative Analysis of Papuk Mountain Geopark (Croatia) and Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) by using GAM Model. in Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences
Baia Mare : North University of Baia Mare., 8(1), 105-116.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_1085
Petrović MD, Vasiljević ĐA, Vujičić MD, Hose TA, Marković SB, Lukić T. Global Geopark and Candidate – Comparative Analysis of Papuk Mountain Geopark (Croatia) and Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) by using GAM Model. in Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences. 2013;8(1):105-116.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_1085 .
Petrović, Marko D., Vasiljević, Đorđije A., Vujičić, Miroslav D., Hose, Thomas A., Marković, Slobodan B., Lukić, Tin, "Global Geopark and Candidate – Comparative Analysis of Papuk Mountain Geopark (Croatia) and Fruška Gora Mountain (Serbia) by using GAM Model" in Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 8, no. 1 (2013):105-116,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_1085 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About DAIS - Digital Archive of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts | Send Feedback

CoreTrustSealre3dataOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About DAIS - Digital Archive of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts | Send Feedback

CoreTrustSealre3dataOpenAIRERCUB