@article{
author = "Грковић-Мејџор, Јасмина",
year = "2010",
abstract = "У раду се анализирају допуне глагола визуалне и аудитивне перцепције у старословенском језику. Два типа допуне (акузатив + партицип и реченица) разликују се по семантичком обележју евидентности.
Развој допуна уз ове глаголе, од праиндоевропског до савремених словенских језика представља се даље у оквиру развоја категорије транзитивности, централне категорије језика номинативног типа., This paper deals with the the complements of the verbs of visual and
auditory perception in Оld Church Slavonic:Ассusative with participle (АР)
and clause. The two types of complements are semantically differentiated by
evidentiality: АР serves for the firsthand evidentiality and the clause for the
non-firsthand evidentiality. Since АР is attested in Оld Russian, Оld Czech as
well in some other old Slavonic languages, it is evident that it was an indigenous
Slavic construction. It belongs to the Indo-European syntactic inheritance —
the appositive double accusative. Since in early Indo-European the accusative
was a general adverbial case, it expressed both types of evidentiality. With
the typological drift of Indo-European and its daughter languages toward
a nominative language type, which meant the development of syntactic
transitivity, the АР was reanalyzed as an object, but only in the cases of the
firsthand evidentiality (where the subject has control over the information).
For non-firsthand evidentiality, another strategy, inherited also from the
proto-language, was used: a sentence with delimitative connective(s). Тhis
process was finished by the end of Proto-Slavonic, as testified by Оld Church
Slavonic. In the process of the further strengthening of transitivity, which gave
a prominent role to the predicate as the centripetal core of the sentence, the
other predicative center — the active participle — had to be removed, while the
passive participle was reanalyzed as an adjective. This led to the loss of the
АР in the early history of Slavic languages and the development of hypotactic
structures. It was a long process, marked by the competition of different
particles and deictic forms which were on the way to be grammaticalized into
conjunctions. It ended with the formation of the two types of conjunctions for
the two types ofevidentiality, e.g. jak — že in Czech, da — će in Bulgarian, kako
— da in Serbian, kak — čto in Russian etc. This shows not only the importance
of evidentiality in a diachronic perspective but also that its formalization is
based on the language type.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ, Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности",
journal = "Јужнословенски филолог",
title = "О конструкцији акузатива спартиципом (типолошки и когнитивни аспекти), On the Assusative with Partіcіple (Typological and Cognitive Aspects)",
pages = "187-204",
volume = "66",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6206"
}
