Bioarchaeology of Ancient Europe: People, Animals and Plants in the Prehistory of Serbia

Link to this page

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47001/RS//

Bioarchaeology of Ancient Europe: People, Animals and Plants in the Prehistory of Serbia (en)
Биоархеологија древне Европе: људи, животиње и биљке у праисторији Србије (sr)
Bioarheologija drevne Evrope: ljudi, životinje i biljke u praistoriji Srbije (sr_RS)
Authors

Publications

Кључна допуна фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен Србије : остаци сисара из наслага пећине Пештурина (Јелашница, источна Србија)

Димитријевић, Весна

(Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Димитријевић, Весна
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/13230
AB  - Од свих фосилних организама, остаци сисара очувани 
у пећинским наслагама имају највећи значај за биостратиграфију плеистоцена 
Србије. Наслаге које садрже остатке фосилних сисара у највећем броју пећина и 
поткапина датују се у последњи глацијал, док су наслаге средњоплеистоценске 
старости откривене једино у пећинском комплексу Баланица у Сићевачкој 
клисури и карстној шупљини Камењак на Венчацу. У пећини Пештурина на 
обронцима Суве планине археолошка ископавања, започета 2004. године, открила 
су наслаге из претпоследњег интерглацијала, које до сада нису биле познате 
у Србији. Резултати ових истраживања, према томе, пружају могућност за 
допуну фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен на територији Србије.
AB  - Although they have a relatively small distribution, particularly in relation 
to loess and alluvial deposits, out of all types of Quaternary formations in Serbia, 
cave deposits have the greatest significance for chronology and stratigraphy of the 
Quaternary period, given that they contain numerous and varied faunal remains, 
especially mammals, as well as traces of human occupation. In the largest number 
of caves and rock shelters these deposits have been dated to the Late Pleistocene, 
i.e. the Last glacial (Dimitrijević, 1991, 1997, 1998; Cvetković and Dimitrijević, 2014; Mihailović, 2014, b), while the Middle Pleistocene deposits were discovered 
only in the cave complex Balanica in Sićevo gorge and karst cavity Kamenjak on 
Venčac (Bogićević et al., 2010; Rink et al., 2013; Mihailović, 2014).
In the course of the excavation in the Pešturina cave, deposits have been 
discovered dated to the penultimate interglacial that contains a number of Paleolithic 
artifacts, as well as rich and well preserved mammalian fauna. Therefore, Pešturina 
sequence provides information for the period between the Middle Pleistocene and 
upper part of the Late Pleistocene, thus completing the faunal sequence of Middle 
and Late Pleistocene in this area.
The Cave Pešturina, or Jelašnička cave (Figure 1), is located on the northern 
slopes of the mountain Suva Planina, southwest of Niš and northwest of the village 
Jelašnica, at an altitude of 330 m. It is 22 m long, and dry, and the bottom and the 
plateau in front of the cave is covered with Quaternary deposits (Mihailović and 
Milošević, 2012; Mihailović, 2014). Archaeological excavations began in 2006, and, 
intermittently, have continued till today. Sediments, the thickness of which exceeds 
5 m, were deposited in the Late Pleistocene, including the penultimate interglacial 
and the last glacial.
The archaeological excavations since 2006 were carried out on an area of 
24 square meters. Faunal material was collected manually and selected contexts 
were sifted dry and wet. Faunal sample selected for the presentation of taxonomic 
composition (Table 1) presented in this paper was collected during excavations of 
nine square meters to a depth of 5m, completed with the year of 2013, and refers 
to the mammalian fauna, except micromammals (defined in this study as rodents 
weighting less than 5 kg, insectivores and bats).
Mammalian fauna of the Pleistocene deposits of the cave Pešturina is 
characterized by great diversity, which is the result of various factors of accumulation 
of their remains. The main agents of accumulation are predators who dragged their 
pray, acquired by hunting or scavenging, into the cave. This applies primarily to 
hyena and wolf, as evidenced by traces of their teeth on many bones, as well as of 
humans, whose activity is indicated by traces of fire, traces of artifacts on bones 
made by animal bodies joint separation and removing flesh from bones, as well as 
traces of blows made on the occasion of bone-breaking to get to the bone marrow. 
The diversity is completed by the remains of bears, both cave and brown, which 
might have used the cave as a den for overwintering. Their remains, however, are 
few, unlike most cave sites of Pleistocene fauna in Serbia, where the remains of cave 
bears are predominant (Cvetković and Dimitrijević, 2014).
Representatives of herbivores of different size are found, from the largest 
– the mammoth and rhinoceros, large herbivores from the odd-toed and eventoed ungulates – bison, horse, giant deer, red deer and hidruntinus, medium size 
ruminants, such as fallow deer, roe deer, alpine ibex, and chamois, as well as small 
ones from the orders of rabbits and rodents. Predators are also pretty diverse, and 
of a considerable range of sizes, from the largest – cave and brown bear and cave lion, then the large and medium-large, such as cave hyena, leopard, and wolf, to 
small ones, such as fox, cat, and badger.
By its richness, mammalian fauna of Pešturina can be compared only with 
the Late Pleistocene mammalian fauna of Baranica, the cave on the bank of the 
Timok near Knjaževac, wherein there was a section with hyena den (Baranica II), 
while the other section (Baranica I) was probably the habitat or temporary shelter 
of bears, but also of hyenas and other predators, including men (Dimitrijević, 2011; 
Mihailović, 2014). The deposits of Risovača near Arandjelovac, the cave where the 
largest-scale excavations were carried out and the most numerous animal remains 
were collected, also contain diverse fauna, which includes herbivores and predators 
ranging from the largest to the smallest, as well as traces of man (Rakovec, 1965; 
Gavela, 1988; Dimitrijević, 1997). However, among these and other cave sites in 
Serbia, the Pešturina cave can be singled out for containing deposits of longer time 
span, namely the penultimate interglacial and the last glacial period, and therefore 
the remains of animals adapted to cold environment in the upper and those adapted 
to warm climate in the lower layers. A characteristic representative of cold age 
fauna is the woolly rhinoceros (Coelodonta antiquitatis). Although the remains of 
the largest Pleistocene mammals, mammoths and rhinos, are common in alluvial 
deposits, they are relatively rare in cave sediments. This type of rhinoceros had 
previously been discovered only in Baranica near Knjaževac and in Janda on Fruška 
Gora (Dimitrijević, 2011; Dimitrijević and Cvetković, 2014).
 The remains of mammals from the layer 4 are, however, of particular 
significance, since they originate from the earlier period of the last glacial (4a) and 
the penultimate interglacial (4b-c), the period which has not yet been confirmed at 
the territory of Serbia. Of warm-loving representatives in the layer 4 in Pešturina 
the remains of porcupine (Hystrix vinogradovi), fallow deer (Dama dama), roe deer 
(Capreolus capreolus) and pigs (Sus scrofa) have been confirmed. The remains of a 
porcupine, from which a complete, well-preserved skull with lower jaw has been 
discovered, were the first ones found in Pleistocene deposits in Serbia; although a 
bone of a large mammal with characteristic traces of teeth of this big rodent had 
been previously found in the Smolućka Cave (in layer 5) (Dimitrijević, 1991). This 
type of large rodent is characteristic of the interglacial stages of Europe (Baryshnikov, 
2003; van Weers, 2005). Fallow deer and roe deer are also represented in Middle 
Pleistocene Balanica (Roksandić et al., 2011), while the remains of deer and pig are 
almost absent in the last glacial cave deposits of Serbia, and only appear in deposits 
that are supposedly related to the early stages of the last glaciations (Dimitrijević, 
1997, 1998).
PB  - Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
T2  - Зборник радова Одбора за крас и спелеологију. 11 : Примљено на I скупу Одељења за математику, физику и гео-науке, 27. фебруара 2021. године
T1  - Кључна допуна фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен Србије : остаци сисара из наслага пећине Пештурина (Јелашница, источна Србија)
T1  - Key addition to faunal sequence of Middle-Late Pleistocene of Serbia : remains of mammals
SP  - 91
EP  - 102
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_13230
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Димитријевић, Весна",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Од свих фосилних организама, остаци сисара очувани 
у пећинским наслагама имају највећи значај за биостратиграфију плеистоцена 
Србије. Наслаге које садрже остатке фосилних сисара у највећем броју пећина и 
поткапина датују се у последњи глацијал, док су наслаге средњоплеистоценске 
старости откривене једино у пећинском комплексу Баланица у Сићевачкој 
клисури и карстној шупљини Камењак на Венчацу. У пећини Пештурина на 
обронцима Суве планине археолошка ископавања, започета 2004. године, открила 
су наслаге из претпоследњег интерглацијала, које до сада нису биле познате 
у Србији. Резултати ових истраживања, према томе, пружају могућност за 
допуну фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен на територији Србије., Although they have a relatively small distribution, particularly in relation 
to loess and alluvial deposits, out of all types of Quaternary formations in Serbia, 
cave deposits have the greatest significance for chronology and stratigraphy of the 
Quaternary period, given that they contain numerous and varied faunal remains, 
especially mammals, as well as traces of human occupation. In the largest number 
of caves and rock shelters these deposits have been dated to the Late Pleistocene, 
i.e. the Last glacial (Dimitrijević, 1991, 1997, 1998; Cvetković and Dimitrijević, 2014; Mihailović, 2014, b), while the Middle Pleistocene deposits were discovered 
only in the cave complex Balanica in Sićevo gorge and karst cavity Kamenjak on 
Venčac (Bogićević et al., 2010; Rink et al., 2013; Mihailović, 2014).
In the course of the excavation in the Pešturina cave, deposits have been 
discovered dated to the penultimate interglacial that contains a number of Paleolithic 
artifacts, as well as rich and well preserved mammalian fauna. Therefore, Pešturina 
sequence provides information for the period between the Middle Pleistocene and 
upper part of the Late Pleistocene, thus completing the faunal sequence of Middle 
and Late Pleistocene in this area.
The Cave Pešturina, or Jelašnička cave (Figure 1), is located on the northern 
slopes of the mountain Suva Planina, southwest of Niš and northwest of the village 
Jelašnica, at an altitude of 330 m. It is 22 m long, and dry, and the bottom and the 
plateau in front of the cave is covered with Quaternary deposits (Mihailović and 
Milošević, 2012; Mihailović, 2014). Archaeological excavations began in 2006, and, 
intermittently, have continued till today. Sediments, the thickness of which exceeds 
5 m, were deposited in the Late Pleistocene, including the penultimate interglacial 
and the last glacial.
The archaeological excavations since 2006 were carried out on an area of 
24 square meters. Faunal material was collected manually and selected contexts 
were sifted dry and wet. Faunal sample selected for the presentation of taxonomic 
composition (Table 1) presented in this paper was collected during excavations of 
nine square meters to a depth of 5m, completed with the year of 2013, and refers 
to the mammalian fauna, except micromammals (defined in this study as rodents 
weighting less than 5 kg, insectivores and bats).
Mammalian fauna of the Pleistocene deposits of the cave Pešturina is 
characterized by great diversity, which is the result of various factors of accumulation 
of their remains. The main agents of accumulation are predators who dragged their 
pray, acquired by hunting or scavenging, into the cave. This applies primarily to 
hyena and wolf, as evidenced by traces of their teeth on many bones, as well as of 
humans, whose activity is indicated by traces of fire, traces of artifacts on bones 
made by animal bodies joint separation and removing flesh from bones, as well as 
traces of blows made on the occasion of bone-breaking to get to the bone marrow. 
The diversity is completed by the remains of bears, both cave and brown, which 
might have used the cave as a den for overwintering. Their remains, however, are 
few, unlike most cave sites of Pleistocene fauna in Serbia, where the remains of cave 
bears are predominant (Cvetković and Dimitrijević, 2014).
Representatives of herbivores of different size are found, from the largest 
– the mammoth and rhinoceros, large herbivores from the odd-toed and eventoed ungulates – bison, horse, giant deer, red deer and hidruntinus, medium size 
ruminants, such as fallow deer, roe deer, alpine ibex, and chamois, as well as small 
ones from the orders of rabbits and rodents. Predators are also pretty diverse, and 
of a considerable range of sizes, from the largest – cave and brown bear and cave lion, then the large and medium-large, such as cave hyena, leopard, and wolf, to 
small ones, such as fox, cat, and badger.
By its richness, mammalian fauna of Pešturina can be compared only with 
the Late Pleistocene mammalian fauna of Baranica, the cave on the bank of the 
Timok near Knjaževac, wherein there was a section with hyena den (Baranica II), 
while the other section (Baranica I) was probably the habitat or temporary shelter 
of bears, but also of hyenas and other predators, including men (Dimitrijević, 2011; 
Mihailović, 2014). The deposits of Risovača near Arandjelovac, the cave where the 
largest-scale excavations were carried out and the most numerous animal remains 
were collected, also contain diverse fauna, which includes herbivores and predators 
ranging from the largest to the smallest, as well as traces of man (Rakovec, 1965; 
Gavela, 1988; Dimitrijević, 1997). However, among these and other cave sites in 
Serbia, the Pešturina cave can be singled out for containing deposits of longer time 
span, namely the penultimate interglacial and the last glacial period, and therefore 
the remains of animals adapted to cold environment in the upper and those adapted 
to warm climate in the lower layers. A characteristic representative of cold age 
fauna is the woolly rhinoceros (Coelodonta antiquitatis). Although the remains of 
the largest Pleistocene mammals, mammoths and rhinos, are common in alluvial 
deposits, they are relatively rare in cave sediments. This type of rhinoceros had 
previously been discovered only in Baranica near Knjaževac and in Janda on Fruška 
Gora (Dimitrijević, 2011; Dimitrijević and Cvetković, 2014).
 The remains of mammals from the layer 4 are, however, of particular 
significance, since they originate from the earlier period of the last glacial (4a) and 
the penultimate interglacial (4b-c), the period which has not yet been confirmed at 
the territory of Serbia. Of warm-loving representatives in the layer 4 in Pešturina 
the remains of porcupine (Hystrix vinogradovi), fallow deer (Dama dama), roe deer 
(Capreolus capreolus) and pigs (Sus scrofa) have been confirmed. The remains of a 
porcupine, from which a complete, well-preserved skull with lower jaw has been 
discovered, were the first ones found in Pleistocene deposits in Serbia; although a 
bone of a large mammal with characteristic traces of teeth of this big rodent had 
been previously found in the Smolućka Cave (in layer 5) (Dimitrijević, 1991). This 
type of large rodent is characteristic of the interglacial stages of Europe (Baryshnikov, 
2003; van Weers, 2005). Fallow deer and roe deer are also represented in Middle 
Pleistocene Balanica (Roksandić et al., 2011), while the remains of deer and pig are 
almost absent in the last glacial cave deposits of Serbia, and only appear in deposits 
that are supposedly related to the early stages of the last glaciations (Dimitrijević, 
1997, 1998).",
publisher = "Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности",
journal = "Зборник радова Одбора за крас и спелеологију. 11 : Примљено на I скупу Одељења за математику, физику и гео-науке, 27. фебруара 2021. године",
title = "Кључна допуна фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен Србије : остаци сисара из наслага пећине Пештурина (Јелашница, источна Србија), Key addition to faunal sequence of Middle-Late Pleistocene of Serbia : remains of mammals",
pages = "91-102",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_13230"
}
Димитријевић, В.. (2021). Кључна допуна фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен Србије : остаци сисара из наслага пећине Пештурина (Јелашница, источна Србија). in Зборник радова Одбора за крас и спелеологију. 11 : Примљено на I скупу Одељења за математику, физику и гео-науке, 27. фебруара 2021. године
Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности., 91-102.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_13230
Димитријевић В. Кључна допуна фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен Србије : остаци сисара из наслага пећине Пештурина (Јелашница, источна Србија). in Зборник радова Одбора за крас и спелеологију. 11 : Примљено на I скупу Одељења за математику, физику и гео-науке, 27. фебруара 2021. године. 2021;:91-102.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_13230 .
Димитријевић, Весна, "Кључна допуна фаунистичке секвенце средњи-касни плеистоцен Србије : остаци сисара из наслага пећине Пештурина (Јелашница, источна Србија)" in Зборник радова Одбора за крас и спелеологију. 11 : Примљено на I скупу Одељења за математику, физику и гео-науке, 27. фебруара 2021. године (2021):91-102,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_13230 .

Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II

Жакула, Соња; Живаљевић, Ивана

(Београд : Етнографски институт САНУ / Belgrade : Institute of Ethnography SASA, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Жакула, Соња
AU  - Живаљевић, Ивана
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://www.ei.sanu.ac.rs/index.php/gei/issue/view/37
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/7517
AB  - Овај текст представља други од планирана два чланка у којима се бавимо проблемом
изучавања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и археологији.
У првом раду (Жакула и Живаљевић 2018), мапирале смо начине на које је питање
животиња и њихових међуодноса са људима у нашим дисциплинама третирано до,
угрубо, осамдесетих година 20. века. У овом раду представићемо нове истраживачке
приступе који су се развили од краја 20. века надаље, а који се одликују, пре свега,
третманом животиња као активних учесница у људском друштву и култури, и могу се
објединити под кишобран-термином животињски обрт.
AB  - This paper represents the second of two planned articles in which we focus on the issue of
the study of human-animal relations in ethnology and anthropology and archaeology. In the
first paper (Žakula & Živaljević 2018), we mapped out the ways in which the issue of
animals and their interrelations with humans was treated in our disciplines up untill, roughly,
the 1980's. In this paper, we will present new research tendencies which developed since the
1980's and are characterized by the treatment of animals as active participants in human
society and culture, and can be lumped together under the umbrella term the animal turn.
PB  - Београд : Етнографски институт САНУ / Belgrade : Institute of Ethnography SASA
T2  - Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA
T1  - Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II
T1  - The study of human-animal relations in anthropology and archaeology II
SP  - 153
EP  - 172
VL  - 67
IS  - 1
DO  - 10.2298/GEI1901153Z
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7517
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Жакула, Соња and Живаљевић, Ивана",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Овај текст представља други од планирана два чланка у којима се бавимо проблемом
изучавања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и археологији.
У првом раду (Жакула и Живаљевић 2018), мапирале смо начине на које је питање
животиња и њихових међуодноса са људима у нашим дисциплинама третирано до,
угрубо, осамдесетих година 20. века. У овом раду представићемо нове истраживачке
приступе који су се развили од краја 20. века надаље, а који се одликују, пре свега,
третманом животиња као активних учесница у људском друштву и култури, и могу се
објединити под кишобран-термином животињски обрт., This paper represents the second of two planned articles in which we focus on the issue of
the study of human-animal relations in ethnology and anthropology and archaeology. In the
first paper (Žakula & Živaljević 2018), we mapped out the ways in which the issue of
animals and their interrelations with humans was treated in our disciplines up untill, roughly,
the 1980's. In this paper, we will present new research tendencies which developed since the
1980's and are characterized by the treatment of animals as active participants in human
society and culture, and can be lumped together under the umbrella term the animal turn.",
publisher = "Београд : Етнографски институт САНУ / Belgrade : Institute of Ethnography SASA",
journal = "Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA",
title = "Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II, The study of human-animal relations in anthropology and archaeology II",
pages = "153-172",
volume = "67",
number = "1",
doi = "10.2298/GEI1901153Z",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7517"
}
Жакула, С.,& Живаљевић, И.. (2019). Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II. in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA
Београд : Етнографски институт САНУ / Belgrade : Institute of Ethnography SASA., 67(1), 153-172.
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901153Z
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7517
Жакула С, Живаљевић И. Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II. in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA. 2019;67(1):153-172.
doi:10.2298/GEI1901153Z
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7517 .
Жакула, Соња, Живаљевић, Ивана, "Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији II" in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, 67, no. 1 (2019):153-172,
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901153Z .,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_7517 .
1

Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I

Žakula, Sonja; Živaljević, Ivana

(Beograd : Etnografski institut SANU, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Žakula, Sonja
AU  - Živaljević, Ivana
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/4493
AB  - This paper is the first of the two planned, in which we will focus on the approaches to the
study of human-animal relations in ethnology and anthropology and archaeology. Even though interest in the role of animals in human societies is almost as old as the disciplines
the authors of this paper come from, changes and turbulences that the social sciences and the
humanities went through in the 1980’s meant that the old foundations on which this interest
was based came into question. Given the complexity and scope of the topic, the narrative on
the study of human-animal relations in anthropology and archaeology is divided into two
parts. In this first paper, we will offer a diachronic review of approaches to the study of
animals, animal remains and human-animal relations from the establishment of our
disciplines to approximately the end of the 20th century, and map changes and convergent
theoretical and methodological tendencies which have led to asking new and different
questions about relationships between humans and other animals, but also opened vast
possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration.
AB  - Овај текст представља први од планирана два чланка у којима ћемо се бавити
проблемом изучaвања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и
археологији. Иако је интересовање за улогу животиња у људским друштвима старо
готово колико и дисциплине из којих ауторке овог текста долазе, промене и
превирања кроз које су друштвене и хуманистичке науке пролазиле осамдесетих
година 20. века условиле су преиспитивање старих основа на којима је ово
интересовање у нашим дисциплинама почивало и, на ширем плану, довеле до
формирања новог интердисциплинарног поља проучавања људско-животињских
односа. Услед комплексности и обима обрађиване теме, прича о изучавању људско–
животињских односа у антропологији и археологији подељена је на два дела. У овом,
првом делу, понудићемо историјски осврт на приступе проучавaњу животиња,
животињских остатака и људско–животињских односа од заснивања наших
дисциплина до, угрубо, краја 20. века, и мапирати конвергентне теоријско-
методолошке тенденције у двема дисциплинама које су, напослетку, довеле до
постављања нових и другачијих питања у вези са односима између људи и других
животиња, али и отвориле низ могућности за интердисциплинарну сарадњу.
PB  - Beograd  : Etnografski institut SANU
T2  - Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA
T1  - Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I
SP  - 255
EP  - 270
VL  - 66
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.2298/GEI1802255Z
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Žakula, Sonja and Živaljević, Ivana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This paper is the first of the two planned, in which we will focus on the approaches to the
study of human-animal relations in ethnology and anthropology and archaeology. Even though interest in the role of animals in human societies is almost as old as the disciplines
the authors of this paper come from, changes and turbulences that the social sciences and the
humanities went through in the 1980’s meant that the old foundations on which this interest
was based came into question. Given the complexity and scope of the topic, the narrative on
the study of human-animal relations in anthropology and archaeology is divided into two
parts. In this first paper, we will offer a diachronic review of approaches to the study of
animals, animal remains and human-animal relations from the establishment of our
disciplines to approximately the end of the 20th century, and map changes and convergent
theoretical and methodological tendencies which have led to asking new and different
questions about relationships between humans and other animals, but also opened vast
possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration., Овај текст представља први од планирана два чланка у којима ћемо се бавити
проблемом изучaвања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и
археологији. Иако је интересовање за улогу животиња у људским друштвима старо
готово колико и дисциплине из којих ауторке овог текста долазе, промене и
превирања кроз које су друштвене и хуманистичке науке пролазиле осамдесетих
година 20. века условиле су преиспитивање старих основа на којима је ово
интересовање у нашим дисциплинама почивало и, на ширем плану, довеле до
формирања новог интердисциплинарног поља проучавања људско-животињских
односа. Услед комплексности и обима обрађиване теме, прича о изучавању људско–
животињских односа у антропологији и археологији подељена је на два дела. У овом,
првом делу, понудићемо историјски осврт на приступе проучавaњу животиња,
животињских остатака и људско–животињских односа од заснивања наших
дисциплина до, угрубо, краја 20. века, и мапирати конвергентне теоријско-
методолошке тенденције у двема дисциплинама које су, напослетку, довеле до
постављања нових и другачијих питања у вези са односима између људи и других
животиња, али и отвориле низ могућности за интердисциплинарну сарадњу.",
publisher = "Beograd  : Etnografski institut SANU",
journal = "Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA",
title = "Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I",
pages = "255-270",
volume = "66",
number = "2",
doi = "10.2298/GEI1802255Z",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493"
}
Žakula, S.,& Živaljević, I.. (2018). Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I. in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA
Beograd  : Etnografski institut SANU., 66(2), 255-270.
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1802255Z
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493
Žakula S, Živaljević I. Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I. in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA. 2018;66(2):255-270.
doi:10.2298/GEI1802255Z
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493 .
Žakula, Sonja, Živaljević, Ivana, "Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I" in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, 66, no. 2 (2018):255-270,
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1802255Z .,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493 .
3