Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
0d8aa445-dd3c-4b07-aaac-2dd4aa5e9de4
  • Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана (4)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Прозни жанрови старе српске књижевности

Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана

(Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности, 2020)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/11986
AB  - Пошто представи све прозне жанрове старе српске књижевности, аутор рада своју пажњу посвећује једном од најзначајнијих међу 
њима ‒ житију. Прати развој тога жанра у првом веку његовог постојања 
(XIII ‒ сам почетак XIV века). Полази од најстаријег дела, Житија Светог 
Симеона од Светог Саве, које је написано око 1208. и представља интегрални 
део Студеничког типика. Мада ово дело формацијски (у саставу је типика) 
припада ктиторским житијима, оно својим обимом, видовима приступа 
јунаку, надилази уобичајене моделе и донекле се приближава развијеним 
житијима.
Житије Светог Симеона од Стефана Првовенчаног (настало између 1208. и 
1216) у раду се посматра у светлости житијног типа коме припада ‒ развијено (опсежно) житије. Пратећи даљи развој жанра, аутор рада се зауставља 
на Житију Светог Саве од Доментијана (завршено 1242/43. или 1253/54. 
године). Приказује његове особености; одређује његову типолошку припадност (житије црквеног поглавара). Говорећи о житијним делима Теодосија 
Хиландарца (стварао крајем XIII и почетком XIV века), Љ. Јухас-Георгиевска 
указује да он прибегава другачијим поетичким решењима од Доментијана. 
Превасходно приповедач, у свом Житију Светог Саве значајно смањује 
учешће поетско-реторских садржаја. У раду се назначава да је Житије 
Светог Петра Коришког од овог писца прво житије пустињака у српској 
литератури.
AB  - This paper focuses on the poetics of the prose genres of old Serbian liter ature. They are all presented in the opening section, following which attention is 
focused onto one of the best-known genres – hagiography. The author of the pa per follows its development in its earliest phase (the 13th and the very beginning 
of the 14th century), which is significant due to the fact that, during this period, 
the characteristic types of hagiographic works were established, as were its com monplace elements, stylistic complexes, etc. 
The analysis proceeds from St Sava, who initiated the continual creation of 
hagiographies in old Serbian literature. He wrote The Hagiography of St Simeon 
(around 1208). This work was conceived as an introduction to a typikon for the 
Studenica Monastery, and in terms of its form, it belongs to ktitor-type hagiog raphies. Sava followed the very old practice of beginning a monastery typikon 
with a hagiography of the monastery founder (ktitor). His hagiography, however, 
due to its length, the approach to the protagonist and the diversity of its artis tic-stylistic devices, goes beyond the usual models and, up to a point, approaches 
a developed hagiography. The author of this paper establishes that Sava introduces 
micro-genres into his work on a modest scale. However, he clearly possesses an 
awareness of their significance and the possibilities that they offer. 
In this paper, it is pointed out that Stefan the First-Crowned deserves cred it for establishing the developed (voluminous, large-scale) hagiography. His The 
Hagiography of St Simeon (written between 1208 and 1216) possesses all the char acteristics typical of this type of hagiography. What is at work here is the ruler-re lated concept of hagiography; it presents the rule of the protagonist in very broad 
terms and thoroughly develops his character as a ruler. Stefan uses more space 
than Sava to present Nemanja’s motives for becoming a monk. He also speaks of 
his saintly activities. This writer uses micro-genres with a greater intensity than 
Sava. He introduces a number of epistles and prayers. In his work, the enkomion 
(praise) has the function of the epilogue. He also establishes a new micro-genre 
– miracle. 
Ljiljana Juhas Georgievska points out that the hieromonk Domentijan sig nificantly contributed to the further development of the hagiography genre. He es tablished a new type of hagiography – the hagiography of a high priest. His main 
work, The Hagiography of St Sava (completed in 1242/43 or in 1253/54) has a very 
complex structure; it possesses a specific design, wherein the rules of the phy genre and those of the enkomion function simultaneously. The historical-doc umentary aspect, which constitutes the foundation of this work, is often transposed 
by Domentijan, elevating it to mythical-biblical allegories, symbols. He introduc es numerous and diverse micro-genres in this work. Enkomions are used to mark 
events of particular significance; through them, he expresses the basic symbolism of 
the work and the relationship between the earthly and the heavenly. Prayers signif icantly contribute to the characterisation of the protagonist. Domentijan makes the 
function of miracles more complex. The miracles introduced in The Hagiography of 
St Sava are numerous and occur in almost every phase of the protagonist’s life. An 
important innovation is the introduction of the travelogue. 
In this paper, the author also pays due attention to Domentijan’s The 
Hagiography of St Simeon (completed in 1264). This work was written on the ba sis of the existing sources. The input of historical and documentary sources was 
decreased, whereas the presence of poetic-rhetorical elements was increased. The 
general tendency was to increase the typification of the protagonist, in the spirit 
of the hagiography canon.
Ljiljana Juhas Georgievska established that the monk Teodosije applied 
different poetic approaches in his hagiographies (created towards the end of the 
13th and in the early 14th century). For his The Hagiography of St Sava, he used 
Domentijan’s work as a source. His approach to the material taken over from 
the source was creative. His narration is warmer and more dynamic than that of 
Domentijan. He transposes the character of Sava from the supradetermined and 
divine value system to a realistic anthropological one. He presents his view of the 
hagiographic genre in the introduction to The Hagiography of St Sava. 
In this paper, it is pointed out that Teodosije somewhat decreased the in put of micro-genres. A significant role in his work is played by epistles, which, as a 
rule, are neither long nor rhetorically intoned. Prayers do not appear as frequently 
as in Domentijan, nor are they markedly poetically-rhetorically intoned. Teodosije 
develops the descriptions of some miracles by introducing interesting narrative de tails. The travelogue segments are more concise in his work, with fewer informative 
details. There are fewer enkomions to be found, but their function is important. 
In this paper, the author carefully analyses Teodosije’s The Hagiography of 
St Petar of Korisha (probably written in the early 14th century), which is the first 
hagiography of a hermit in Serbian literature. 
The conclusion reached in this paper is that the 13th century was the period 
when hagiographic literature appeared and was established. The main types of such 
works were established then. Also established was the prologue (synaxarion) type 
hagiography, which was not specifically discussed in this paper. What the earliest 
period had to offer to the later ones, apart from the developed typology of hagiographies, was a number of excellent solutions in terms of ideas and stylistic devices, 
and also on the level of the characterisation of the protagonists of hagiographies.
PB  - Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
C3  - Развој поетике српске књижевности: теорија књижевности код Срба
T1  - Прозни жанрови старе српске књижевности
T1  - Тhe Prose Genres of Old Serbian Literature
SP  - 7
EP  - 22
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_11986
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Пошто представи све прозне жанрове старе српске књижевности, аутор рада своју пажњу посвећује једном од најзначајнијих међу 
њима ‒ житију. Прати развој тога жанра у првом веку његовог постојања 
(XIII ‒ сам почетак XIV века). Полази од најстаријег дела, Житија Светог 
Симеона од Светог Саве, које је написано око 1208. и представља интегрални 
део Студеничког типика. Мада ово дело формацијски (у саставу је типика) 
припада ктиторским житијима, оно својим обимом, видовима приступа 
јунаку, надилази уобичајене моделе и донекле се приближава развијеним 
житијима.
Житије Светог Симеона од Стефана Првовенчаног (настало између 1208. и 
1216) у раду се посматра у светлости житијног типа коме припада ‒ развијено (опсежно) житије. Пратећи даљи развој жанра, аутор рада се зауставља 
на Житију Светог Саве од Доментијана (завршено 1242/43. или 1253/54. 
године). Приказује његове особености; одређује његову типолошку припадност (житије црквеног поглавара). Говорећи о житијним делима Теодосија 
Хиландарца (стварао крајем XIII и почетком XIV века), Љ. Јухас-Георгиевска 
указује да он прибегава другачијим поетичким решењима од Доментијана. 
Превасходно приповедач, у свом Житију Светог Саве значајно смањује 
учешће поетско-реторских садржаја. У раду се назначава да је Житије 
Светог Петра Коришког од овог писца прво житије пустињака у српској 
литератури., This paper focuses on the poetics of the prose genres of old Serbian liter ature. They are all presented in the opening section, following which attention is 
focused onto one of the best-known genres – hagiography. The author of the pa per follows its development in its earliest phase (the 13th and the very beginning 
of the 14th century), which is significant due to the fact that, during this period, 
the characteristic types of hagiographic works were established, as were its com monplace elements, stylistic complexes, etc. 
The analysis proceeds from St Sava, who initiated the continual creation of 
hagiographies in old Serbian literature. He wrote The Hagiography of St Simeon 
(around 1208). This work was conceived as an introduction to a typikon for the 
Studenica Monastery, and in terms of its form, it belongs to ktitor-type hagiog raphies. Sava followed the very old practice of beginning a monastery typikon 
with a hagiography of the monastery founder (ktitor). His hagiography, however, 
due to its length, the approach to the protagonist and the diversity of its artis tic-stylistic devices, goes beyond the usual models and, up to a point, approaches 
a developed hagiography. The author of this paper establishes that Sava introduces 
micro-genres into his work on a modest scale. However, he clearly possesses an 
awareness of their significance and the possibilities that they offer. 
In this paper, it is pointed out that Stefan the First-Crowned deserves cred it for establishing the developed (voluminous, large-scale) hagiography. His The 
Hagiography of St Simeon (written between 1208 and 1216) possesses all the char acteristics typical of this type of hagiography. What is at work here is the ruler-re lated concept of hagiography; it presents the rule of the protagonist in very broad 
terms and thoroughly develops his character as a ruler. Stefan uses more space 
than Sava to present Nemanja’s motives for becoming a monk. He also speaks of 
his saintly activities. This writer uses micro-genres with a greater intensity than 
Sava. He introduces a number of epistles and prayers. In his work, the enkomion 
(praise) has the function of the epilogue. He also establishes a new micro-genre 
– miracle. 
Ljiljana Juhas Georgievska points out that the hieromonk Domentijan sig nificantly contributed to the further development of the hagiography genre. He es tablished a new type of hagiography – the hagiography of a high priest. His main 
work, The Hagiography of St Sava (completed in 1242/43 or in 1253/54) has a very 
complex structure; it possesses a specific design, wherein the rules of the phy genre and those of the enkomion function simultaneously. The historical-doc umentary aspect, which constitutes the foundation of this work, is often transposed 
by Domentijan, elevating it to mythical-biblical allegories, symbols. He introduc es numerous and diverse micro-genres in this work. Enkomions are used to mark 
events of particular significance; through them, he expresses the basic symbolism of 
the work and the relationship between the earthly and the heavenly. Prayers signif icantly contribute to the characterisation of the protagonist. Domentijan makes the 
function of miracles more complex. The miracles introduced in The Hagiography of 
St Sava are numerous and occur in almost every phase of the protagonist’s life. An 
important innovation is the introduction of the travelogue. 
In this paper, the author also pays due attention to Domentijan’s The 
Hagiography of St Simeon (completed in 1264). This work was written on the ba sis of the existing sources. The input of historical and documentary sources was 
decreased, whereas the presence of poetic-rhetorical elements was increased. The 
general tendency was to increase the typification of the protagonist, in the spirit 
of the hagiography canon.
Ljiljana Juhas Georgievska established that the monk Teodosije applied 
different poetic approaches in his hagiographies (created towards the end of the 
13th and in the early 14th century). For his The Hagiography of St Sava, he used 
Domentijan’s work as a source. His approach to the material taken over from 
the source was creative. His narration is warmer and more dynamic than that of 
Domentijan. He transposes the character of Sava from the supradetermined and 
divine value system to a realistic anthropological one. He presents his view of the 
hagiographic genre in the introduction to The Hagiography of St Sava. 
In this paper, it is pointed out that Teodosije somewhat decreased the in put of micro-genres. A significant role in his work is played by epistles, which, as a 
rule, are neither long nor rhetorically intoned. Prayers do not appear as frequently 
as in Domentijan, nor are they markedly poetically-rhetorically intoned. Teodosije 
develops the descriptions of some miracles by introducing interesting narrative de tails. The travelogue segments are more concise in his work, with fewer informative 
details. There are fewer enkomions to be found, but their function is important. 
In this paper, the author carefully analyses Teodosije’s The Hagiography of 
St Petar of Korisha (probably written in the early 14th century), which is the first 
hagiography of a hermit in Serbian literature. 
The conclusion reached in this paper is that the 13th century was the period 
when hagiographic literature appeared and was established. The main types of such 
works were established then. Also established was the prologue (synaxarion) type 
hagiography, which was not specifically discussed in this paper. What the earliest 
period had to offer to the later ones, apart from the developed typology of hagiographies, was a number of excellent solutions in terms of ideas and stylistic devices, 
and also on the level of the characterisation of the protagonists of hagiographies.",
publisher = "Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности",
journal = "Развој поетике српске књижевности: теорија књижевности код Срба",
title = "Прозни жанрови старе српске књижевности, Тhe Prose Genres of Old Serbian Literature",
pages = "7-22",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_11986"
}
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љ.. (2020). Прозни жанрови старе српске књижевности. in Развој поетике српске књижевности: теорија књижевности код Срба
Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности., 7-22.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_11986
Јухас-Георгиевска Љ. Прозни жанрови старе српске књижевности. in Развој поетике српске књижевности: теорија књижевности код Срба. 2020;:7-22.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_11986 .
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана, "Прозни жанрови старе српске књижевности" in Развој поетике српске књижевности: теорија књижевности код Срба (2020):7-22,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_11986 .

Павле Поповић о старим српским биографијама

Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана

(Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности, 2019)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/9352
AB  - У овом раду аутор представља своје резултате у истраживању доприноса Павла Поповића проучавању старих српских биографија.
Он хронолошки прати и анализира Поповићеве студије и радове у којима
је реч о српским биографима и њиховим делима. Посебно се задржава на
Преgлеɡу сtаре књижевносtи (објављен у „Српском књижевном гласнику“
1907), где Поповић, по први пут целовито, приказује основне карактеристике
жанра, представља њему познате писце који су у његовим оквирима стварали
и сама дела. Овај преглед, допуњен и с новом систематизацијом писаца, недуго затим улази у састав Поповићеве књиге Преgлеɡ срpске књижевносtи
(штампана 1909). Аутор рада настојао је да установи интервенције (измене,
допуне), али и да у целини сагледа значај новога текста, који ће потом, деценијама, бити главни извор сазнања о српској биографици.
Аутор у раду представља и позније Поповићеве радове. Указује да се
он изнова враћао на старе српске биографије. Био је спреман да о њима још
документованије и научнички зрелије говори у својој књизи Исtорија јуgословенске књижевносtи, коју је припремао, али је није довршио; о томе
сведоче неколики сачувани фрагменти из ње.
Аутор закључује да се Павле Поповић истрајно и темељно бавио старим српским биографијама. Врло рано је остварио лични приступ и засновао
сопствени метод проучавања и критеријуме за естетско вредновање дела.
AB  - The author of this paper has researched the contribution of the wellknown Serbian literary historian Pavle Popović to the study of old Serbian
biographies. In this paper, it is pointed out that Popović’s first papers dedicated
to old Serbian biographies were written in the final decade of the 19th century
and at the very beginning of the 20th century. They were published in periodicals of that time (Srpski pregled [Serbian Review], Nastavnik [Teacher] and
others). Popović dealt with archaeographic and textological issues, investigated sources and especially focused on St Sava and Teodosije.
Ljiljana Juhas-Georgievska established that Pavle Popović first wrote
about old Serbian biographies in a detailed manner in his An Overview of
Old Serbian Literature, published in Srpski književni glasnik [Serbian Literary
Herald] in 1907. In this paper, he presented the basic characteristics of the
genre, wrote about the authors known to him who belonged to this genre and
their works. He adhered to the chronological principle. This Overview, somewhat expanded, was subsequently included in Popović’s book An Overview
of Old Serbian Literature (published in 1909). Taking over the earlier text,
Popović expanded it by adding new information. He added new writers to the
list (he wrote about Patriarch Pajsije). He presented the opuses of Danilo the
Second and his Disciple in a more detailed manner.
The author of this paper points out that, later on in his studies, Popović
returned to old Serbian biographies. That he was prepared to write about them
in a more documented and scientifically mature manner in his book A History
of Yugoslav Literature (he worked on it towards the end of his life but did not
get to finish it), is testified to by the preserved fragments of the book. One of
them, in which he analysed the work of Gregory Tsamblak, Constantine the
Philosopher and Patriarch Pajsije, is presented by Lj. Juhas Georgievska in
this paper. In it, Popović dealt with the poetics of these authors in a much more
detailed manner, shedding light on the circumstances and the atmosphere in
which their works were created.
 It is concluded in this paper that Pavle Popović perseveringly and in a
detailed manner dealt with old Serbian biographies. Very early on, he established his personal approach and his own method of scientific investigation.
Owing to his developed feeling for aesthetics, criteria and great erudition, he
could successfully analyse the most complex and demanding works.
Returning to certain authors and their biographical works was very fruitful
for Popović’s scientific work. His later works were more thoroughly researched
and produced results whose value has not diminished to the present day.
PB  - Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
C3  - Периодизација нове српске књижевности : поводом 150. годишњице рођења Павла Поповића (16. IV 1868 - 4. VI 1939)
T1  - Павле Поповић о старим српским биографијама
T1  - Pavle Popović on old Serbian biographies
SP  - 41
EP  - 52
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9352
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана",
year = "2019",
abstract = "У овом раду аутор представља своје резултате у истраживању доприноса Павла Поповића проучавању старих српских биографија.
Он хронолошки прати и анализира Поповићеве студије и радове у којима
је реч о српским биографима и њиховим делима. Посебно се задржава на
Преgлеɡу сtаре књижевносtи (објављен у „Српском књижевном гласнику“
1907), где Поповић, по први пут целовито, приказује основне карактеристике
жанра, представља њему познате писце који су у његовим оквирима стварали
и сама дела. Овај преглед, допуњен и с новом систематизацијом писаца, недуго затим улази у састав Поповићеве књиге Преgлеɡ срpске књижевносtи
(штампана 1909). Аутор рада настојао је да установи интервенције (измене,
допуне), али и да у целини сагледа значај новога текста, који ће потом, деценијама, бити главни извор сазнања о српској биографици.
Аутор у раду представља и позније Поповићеве радове. Указује да се
он изнова враћао на старе српске биографије. Био је спреман да о њима још
документованије и научнички зрелије говори у својој књизи Исtорија јуgословенске књижевносtи, коју је припремао, али је није довршио; о томе
сведоче неколики сачувани фрагменти из ње.
Аутор закључује да се Павле Поповић истрајно и темељно бавио старим српским биографијама. Врло рано је остварио лични приступ и засновао
сопствени метод проучавања и критеријуме за естетско вредновање дела., The author of this paper has researched the contribution of the wellknown Serbian literary historian Pavle Popović to the study of old Serbian
biographies. In this paper, it is pointed out that Popović’s first papers dedicated
to old Serbian biographies were written in the final decade of the 19th century
and at the very beginning of the 20th century. They were published in periodicals of that time (Srpski pregled [Serbian Review], Nastavnik [Teacher] and
others). Popović dealt with archaeographic and textological issues, investigated sources and especially focused on St Sava and Teodosije.
Ljiljana Juhas-Georgievska established that Pavle Popović first wrote
about old Serbian biographies in a detailed manner in his An Overview of
Old Serbian Literature, published in Srpski književni glasnik [Serbian Literary
Herald] in 1907. In this paper, he presented the basic characteristics of the
genre, wrote about the authors known to him who belonged to this genre and
their works. He adhered to the chronological principle. This Overview, somewhat expanded, was subsequently included in Popović’s book An Overview
of Old Serbian Literature (published in 1909). Taking over the earlier text,
Popović expanded it by adding new information. He added new writers to the
list (he wrote about Patriarch Pajsije). He presented the opuses of Danilo the
Second and his Disciple in a more detailed manner.
The author of this paper points out that, later on in his studies, Popović
returned to old Serbian biographies. That he was prepared to write about them
in a more documented and scientifically mature manner in his book A History
of Yugoslav Literature (he worked on it towards the end of his life but did not
get to finish it), is testified to by the preserved fragments of the book. One of
them, in which he analysed the work of Gregory Tsamblak, Constantine the
Philosopher and Patriarch Pajsije, is presented by Lj. Juhas Georgievska in
this paper. In it, Popović dealt with the poetics of these authors in a much more
detailed manner, shedding light on the circumstances and the atmosphere in
which their works were created.
 It is concluded in this paper that Pavle Popović perseveringly and in a
detailed manner dealt with old Serbian biographies. Very early on, he established his personal approach and his own method of scientific investigation.
Owing to his developed feeling for aesthetics, criteria and great erudition, he
could successfully analyse the most complex and demanding works.
Returning to certain authors and their biographical works was very fruitful
for Popović’s scientific work. His later works were more thoroughly researched
and produced results whose value has not diminished to the present day.",
publisher = "Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности",
journal = "Периодизација нове српске књижевности : поводом 150. годишњице рођења Павла Поповића (16. IV 1868 - 4. VI 1939)",
title = "Павле Поповић о старим српским биографијама, Pavle Popović on old Serbian biographies",
pages = "41-52",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9352"
}
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љ.. (2019). Павле Поповић о старим српским биографијама. in Периодизација нове српске књижевности : поводом 150. годишњице рођења Павла Поповића (16. IV 1868 - 4. VI 1939)
Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности., 41-52.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9352
Јухас-Георгиевска Љ. Павле Поповић о старим српским биографијама. in Периодизација нове српске књижевности : поводом 150. годишњице рођења Павла Поповића (16. IV 1868 - 4. VI 1939). 2019;:41-52.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9352 .
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана, "Павле Поповић о старим српским биографијама" in Периодизација нове српске књижевности : поводом 150. годишњице рођења Павла Поповића (16. IV 1868 - 4. VI 1939) (2019):41-52,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9352 .

Ђура Даничић и стара српска књижевност

Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана

(Београд : Српска академија и уметности, 2017)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/3334
AB  - У овом раду представљају се резултати у истраживању доприноса Ђуре Даничића српској медиевистици током његовог активног деловања у Друштву српске словесности (1841–1861). Пажњу аутора рада најпре заокупљају Даничићеви прикази посебно значајних књига објављених на страни и код нас, а посвећених српској средњовековној књижевности. Публикујући ове приказе, Даничић је настојао да српску јавност упозна са најновијим научним сазнањима, али и да подстакне трагање за још неоткривеним књижевним делима и ствараоцима. Аутор рада затим представља Даничићев непосредни допринос упознавању са књижевном баштином
(описивао рукописе, приређивао издања). Унеколико осветљава Даничићев
текстолошки рад, а знатнo већу пажњу посвећује његовим настојањима да вреднује књижевна дела и одреди им место у оквирима средњовековне књижевности. Темељнијој анализи подвргава садржаје Даничићевих сачуваних предавања на Лицеју, у којима се, на систематичан начин, приказују карактеристике српске средњовековне књижевности и оцртава, унеколико, њен развој.
AB  - In this paper, the author presents the results of her research into the contribution of Đura Daničić to Serbian mediaeval studies during his active participation in the work of the Slavic Literacy Society (1849–1861). She also takes into consideration Daničić’s scientifi c projects initiated during this period and completed somewhat later. The author considers the forms of Daničić’s engagement in the sphere of mediaeval studies. She points out that Daničić, striving to present the latest scientifi c insights, early on began to publish reviews of particularly important books and editions published abroad and in our country. His aim was undoubtedly to inform the Serbian public, and also to stimulate
searching for the as yet undiscovered literary works and writers from the medieval era. He presented the signifi cant works of P. J. Šafarik, F. Miklošić, Vuk Stefanović Karadžić and others. As this paper points out, Daničić strove to contribute himself to getting acquainted with the literary heritage. He therefore took upon himself to provide descriptions of signifi cant manuscripts and edit the actual works. He provided descriptions of manuscripts from the collections of the National Library and the library of the Slavic Literacy Society. In separate books, Daničić published the writings of some of the most important Serbian writers of the Middle Ages – Domentijan, Teodosije, Danilo the Second and his Disciple. He also published a number of smaller works. The author also partially sheds light on Daničić’s work in the sphere of textology. Her attention was drawn, to a signifi cant degree, to Daničić’s observations on
the formal and stylistic characteristics of works and his value judgements. The contents of Daničić’s preserved lectures at Belgrade’s High School were subjected to a thorough analysis. In them, Daničić systematically reviewed the essential characteristics of old Serbian literature, its dominant genres, and partly delineated its development. Daničić dedicated his lecture entitled The Beginnings of Serbian Literature primarily to the literature of the era of Nemanja and St. Sava. However, he manifested a very lively interest in the literature that preceded this very well known one, of which there are no visible traces left (no works were preserved). In Daničić’s view, Serbian literature reached its peak achievement (“fl ourished to the utmost”) at its very beginnings. This happened, Daničić thinks, on account of favourable
social circumstances (the state was growing stronger). Daničić sees the subsequent development of Serbian literature as regressive; his evaluation of literary works from the centuries that followed is that they were less
successful artistically. He ascribes this line of development to changed social circumstances (the upheavals and power struggles in the Serbian state).
Daničić’s understanding of literary history as a regressive process, as the author of this paper observes, is not an isolated phenomenon; P. J. Šafarik had an identical view of mediaeval Serbian literature. Like other scholars of that time, Daničić saw literature as a forceful refl ection of the current political and social circumstances. In his lecture entitled Offi ces to Serbian Saints, Daničić pointed to the time of the creation of Offi ces, to the works and authors known to him. The author’s attention was particularly drawn to the segment of this text dedicated to Jefi mija’s Praise of Prince Lazar; it appears in a manuscript (that of Kiprijan) as an integral part of The Offi ce to Prince Lazar. Daničić evaluates Jefi mija’s work as exceptional and presents an interesting hypothesis on the circumstances that contributed to its being included in the Offi ce. He even posits a rather bold hypothesis that Jefi mija is the authoress of the Offi ce. It is the conclusion of this paper that Daničić undertook archaeographic and textological work, preparing editions at a time when there were not many
scholars equal to these tasks. He adopted methods from European science, but also founded them himself, through concrete work on manuscripts. Daničić was undoubtedly oriented towards philology in the original meaning of the termExcept in his lectures, he did not undertake literary-aesthetic analyses
and evaluation of literary works to such an extent. That he was gifted for such an undertaking is evidenced, most of all, by his concise but exemplary
essay on Jefi mija the nun’s Praise to Prince Lazar. It is to be assumed that in those lectures of his that have not been preserved he dealt with the work of other writers known at the time.
PB  - Београд : Српска академија и уметности
C3  - Књижевност и језик у Друштву српске словесности
C3  - Đura Daničić and Old Serbian literature
T1  - Ђура Даничић и стара српска књижевност
T1  - Đura Daničić and Old Serbian literature
SP  - [125]
EP  - 145
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_3334
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана",
year = "2017",
abstract = "У овом раду представљају се резултати у истраживању доприноса Ђуре Даничића српској медиевистици током његовог активног деловања у Друштву српске словесности (1841–1861). Пажњу аутора рада најпре заокупљају Даничићеви прикази посебно значајних књига објављених на страни и код нас, а посвећених српској средњовековној књижевности. Публикујући ове приказе, Даничић је настојао да српску јавност упозна са најновијим научним сазнањима, али и да подстакне трагање за још неоткривеним књижевним делима и ствараоцима. Аутор рада затим представља Даничићев непосредни допринос упознавању са књижевном баштином
(описивао рукописе, приређивао издања). Унеколико осветљава Даничићев
текстолошки рад, а знатнo већу пажњу посвећује његовим настојањима да вреднује књижевна дела и одреди им место у оквирима средњовековне књижевности. Темељнијој анализи подвргава садржаје Даничићевих сачуваних предавања на Лицеју, у којима се, на систематичан начин, приказују карактеристике српске средњовековне књижевности и оцртава, унеколико, њен развој., In this paper, the author presents the results of her research into the contribution of Đura Daničić to Serbian mediaeval studies during his active participation in the work of the Slavic Literacy Society (1849–1861). She also takes into consideration Daničić’s scientifi c projects initiated during this period and completed somewhat later. The author considers the forms of Daničić’s engagement in the sphere of mediaeval studies. She points out that Daničić, striving to present the latest scientifi c insights, early on began to publish reviews of particularly important books and editions published abroad and in our country. His aim was undoubtedly to inform the Serbian public, and also to stimulate
searching for the as yet undiscovered literary works and writers from the medieval era. He presented the signifi cant works of P. J. Šafarik, F. Miklošić, Vuk Stefanović Karadžić and others. As this paper points out, Daničić strove to contribute himself to getting acquainted with the literary heritage. He therefore took upon himself to provide descriptions of signifi cant manuscripts and edit the actual works. He provided descriptions of manuscripts from the collections of the National Library and the library of the Slavic Literacy Society. In separate books, Daničić published the writings of some of the most important Serbian writers of the Middle Ages – Domentijan, Teodosije, Danilo the Second and his Disciple. He also published a number of smaller works. The author also partially sheds light on Daničić’s work in the sphere of textology. Her attention was drawn, to a signifi cant degree, to Daničić’s observations on
the formal and stylistic characteristics of works and his value judgements. The contents of Daničić’s preserved lectures at Belgrade’s High School were subjected to a thorough analysis. In them, Daničić systematically reviewed the essential characteristics of old Serbian literature, its dominant genres, and partly delineated its development. Daničić dedicated his lecture entitled The Beginnings of Serbian Literature primarily to the literature of the era of Nemanja and St. Sava. However, he manifested a very lively interest in the literature that preceded this very well known one, of which there are no visible traces left (no works were preserved). In Daničić’s view, Serbian literature reached its peak achievement (“fl ourished to the utmost”) at its very beginnings. This happened, Daničić thinks, on account of favourable
social circumstances (the state was growing stronger). Daničić sees the subsequent development of Serbian literature as regressive; his evaluation of literary works from the centuries that followed is that they were less
successful artistically. He ascribes this line of development to changed social circumstances (the upheavals and power struggles in the Serbian state).
Daničić’s understanding of literary history as a regressive process, as the author of this paper observes, is not an isolated phenomenon; P. J. Šafarik had an identical view of mediaeval Serbian literature. Like other scholars of that time, Daničić saw literature as a forceful refl ection of the current political and social circumstances. In his lecture entitled Offi ces to Serbian Saints, Daničić pointed to the time of the creation of Offi ces, to the works and authors known to him. The author’s attention was particularly drawn to the segment of this text dedicated to Jefi mija’s Praise of Prince Lazar; it appears in a manuscript (that of Kiprijan) as an integral part of The Offi ce to Prince Lazar. Daničić evaluates Jefi mija’s work as exceptional and presents an interesting hypothesis on the circumstances that contributed to its being included in the Offi ce. He even posits a rather bold hypothesis that Jefi mija is the authoress of the Offi ce. It is the conclusion of this paper that Daničić undertook archaeographic and textological work, preparing editions at a time when there were not many
scholars equal to these tasks. He adopted methods from European science, but also founded them himself, through concrete work on manuscripts. Daničić was undoubtedly oriented towards philology in the original meaning of the termExcept in his lectures, he did not undertake literary-aesthetic analyses
and evaluation of literary works to such an extent. That he was gifted for such an undertaking is evidenced, most of all, by his concise but exemplary
essay on Jefi mija the nun’s Praise to Prince Lazar. It is to be assumed that in those lectures of his that have not been preserved he dealt with the work of other writers known at the time.",
publisher = "Београд : Српска академија и уметности",
journal = "Књижевност и језик у Друштву српске словесности, Đura Daničić and Old Serbian literature",
title = "Ђура Даничић и стара српска књижевност, Đura Daničić and Old Serbian literature",
pages = "[125]-145",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_3334"
}
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љ.. (2017). Ђура Даничић и стара српска књижевност. in Књижевност и језик у Друштву српске словесности
Београд : Српска академија и уметности., [125]-145.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_3334
Јухас-Георгиевска Љ. Ђура Даничић и стара српска књижевност. in Књижевност и језик у Друштву српске словесности. 2017;:[125]-145.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_3334 .
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана, "Ђура Даничић и стара српска књижевност" in Књижевност и језик у Друштву српске словесности (2017):[125]-145,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_3334 .

Карактеризација јунака у старословенским житијима Ћирила и Методија и у српским житијима прве половине XIII века

Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана

(Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ, 2014)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/14452
AB  - The author of this paper discusses the Old Slavonic hagiographies dedicated
to Cyril and Methodius and Serbian hagiographies written until the middle of the
13th century. The study seeks to establish whether Serbian literary works reveal the
influence of Old Slavonic writings in terms of protagonist characterization. The
author compares the hagiographies of Saint Simeon written by his sons Sava and
Stefan with the Life of Saint Cyril, to establish that, though typologically different,
both Serbian hagiographies share similarities to the mentioned Old Slavonic
hagiographies, namely in places describing the act of taking monastic vows and
the monastic life of the main protagonists. Another similarity with the Life of St
Cyril is that they refer to the main protagonist as a saint.
The author of the paper has noted similarities at the compositional level
between the Life of Saint Simeon by Stefan the First-Crowned and the Life of Saint
Methodius (there is a strong conceptual link between the introduction and the rest
of the text). The introduction is largely programmatic in character and it plays an
important role in the conceptual shaping of the protagonist.
Through a comparison of all of the three early Serbian hagiographic compositions
with the Life of Saint Cyril, the author of the paper has found that they
are similar in terms of the applied forms of direct and indirect characterization
of the protagonist.
A comparison between Domentijan’s Life of Saint Sava and the hagiography
of St Methodius has revealed similarities between the two compositions at the
levels of motifs and protagonist characterization. Domentijan makes a more intense
and diversified use of certain literary and artistic means and methods than
the author of St Methodius’ hagiography.
AB  - Аутор
проучава
видове
карактеризације
јунака
у житијним
делима
посвећеним
Ћирилу
и Методију
и раним
српским
житијима.
Поредећи
животописе
Светог
Симеона
од Светог
Саве
и Стефана
Првовенчаног
са
Житијем
Светог
Ћирила,
увиђа
одређену
њихову
сродност
на местима
где је реч о монашењу
јунака.
Запажа
да су Немања
и „словенски
апостоли“
блиски
и по томе
што су се, након
своје
смрти,
објавили
као свети.
Кроз компарацију
аутор
открива
да се српска
житија
приближавају
најстаријем
словенском
и када
је реч о средствима
директне
и индиректне
портретизације
јунака.
Доментијан
је писцу
Житија
Ћириловог
близак
по
томе
што и сам интензивније
користи
поетско‑симболички
слој у реализацији
лика.
Упоређујући
Житије
Светог
Саве
са Методијевим
житијем,
аутор
је стао на становиште
да су ова дела
у значајном
степену
мотивски
сродна;
сродна
су и у погледу
видова
индиректне
карактеризације
јунака.
PB  - Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ
C3  - Свети Ћирило и Методије и словенско писано наслеђе (863–2013)
T1  - Карактеризација јунака у старословенским житијима Ћирила и Методија и у српским житијима прве половине XIII века
T1  - Protagonist Characterization in the Old Slavonic Hagiographies of Cyril and Methodius and Serbian Hagiographies from the First Half of the 13th Century
SP  - 349
EP  - 373
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14452
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The author of this paper discusses the Old Slavonic hagiographies dedicated
to Cyril and Methodius and Serbian hagiographies written until the middle of the
13th century. The study seeks to establish whether Serbian literary works reveal the
influence of Old Slavonic writings in terms of protagonist characterization. The
author compares the hagiographies of Saint Simeon written by his sons Sava and
Stefan with the Life of Saint Cyril, to establish that, though typologically different,
both Serbian hagiographies share similarities to the mentioned Old Slavonic
hagiographies, namely in places describing the act of taking monastic vows and
the monastic life of the main protagonists. Another similarity with the Life of St
Cyril is that they refer to the main protagonist as a saint.
The author of the paper has noted similarities at the compositional level
between the Life of Saint Simeon by Stefan the First-Crowned and the Life of Saint
Methodius (there is a strong conceptual link between the introduction and the rest
of the text). The introduction is largely programmatic in character and it plays an
important role in the conceptual shaping of the protagonist.
Through a comparison of all of the three early Serbian hagiographic compositions
with the Life of Saint Cyril, the author of the paper has found that they
are similar in terms of the applied forms of direct and indirect characterization
of the protagonist.
A comparison between Domentijan’s Life of Saint Sava and the hagiography
of St Methodius has revealed similarities between the two compositions at the
levels of motifs and protagonist characterization. Domentijan makes a more intense
and diversified use of certain literary and artistic means and methods than
the author of St Methodius’ hagiography., Аутор
проучава
видове
карактеризације
јунака
у житијним
делима
посвећеним
Ћирилу
и Методију
и раним
српским
житијима.
Поредећи
животописе
Светог
Симеона
од Светог
Саве
и Стефана
Првовенчаног
са
Житијем
Светог
Ћирила,
увиђа
одређену
њихову
сродност
на местима
где је реч о монашењу
јунака.
Запажа
да су Немања
и „словенски
апостоли“
блиски
и по томе
што су се, након
своје
смрти,
објавили
као свети.
Кроз компарацију
аутор
открива
да се српска
житија
приближавају
најстаријем
словенском
и када
је реч о средствима
директне
и индиректне
портретизације
јунака.
Доментијан
је писцу
Житија
Ћириловог
близак
по
томе
што и сам интензивније
користи
поетско‑симболички
слој у реализацији
лика.
Упоређујући
Житије
Светог
Саве
са Методијевим
житијем,
аутор
је стао на становиште
да су ова дела
у значајном
степену
мотивски
сродна;
сродна
су и у погледу
видова
индиректне
карактеризације
јунака.",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ",
journal = "Свети Ћирило и Методије и словенско писано наслеђе (863–2013)",
title = "Карактеризација јунака у старословенским житијима Ћирила и Методија и у српским житијима прве половине XIII века, Protagonist Characterization in the Old Slavonic Hagiographies of Cyril and Methodius and Serbian Hagiographies from the First Half of the 13th Century",
pages = "349-373",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14452"
}
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љ.. (2014). Карактеризација јунака у старословенским житијима Ћирила и Методија и у српским житијима прве половине XIII века. in Свети Ћирило и Методије и словенско писано наслеђе (863–2013)
Београд : Институт за српски језик САНУ., 349-373.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14452
Јухас-Георгиевска Љ. Карактеризација јунака у старословенским житијима Ћирила и Методија и у српским житијима прве половине XIII века. in Свети Ћирило и Методије и словенско писано наслеђе (863–2013). 2014;:349-373.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14452 .
Јухас-Георгиевска, Љиљана, "Карактеризација јунака у старословенским житијима Ћирила и Методија и у српским житијима прве половине XIII века" in Свети Ћирило и Методије и словенско писано наслеђе (863–2013) (2014):349-373,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14452 .