TY  - GEN
AU  - Mansrud, Anja
AU  - Windle, Morgan
AU  - Armstrong-Oma, Kristin
AU  - Živaljević, Ivana
AU  - Žakula, Sonja
AU  - Piezonka, Henny
AU  - Dudeck, Stephan
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://www.ucd.ie/chags13/academicprogramme/sessionsandpaperabstracts/
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/14351
AB  - This session proposes multispecies approaches and understandings advanced within the ontological turn, as analytical frameworks for exploring how hunter-gatherers past and present were living (well?) with other species. Prehistoric archaeology, entailing the study of human and animal remains from the beginnings of humanity, on a global scale, can contribute in a unique way to explore what it means to be human in a world populated by non-human others. Throughout the Holocene humans have lived with animals in multispecies environments. How humans have lived with animals varies within, and between, societies. Animals have been bred, domesticated, buried, hunted, and fished, nurtured as pets and companions in addition to being exploited as food and materials. We also reflect on the role of insects as cultural agents, by focusing on how insects have impacted hunterfisher lifeways in the past and present, and what sort of challenges or solutions can insects represent to hunter-gatherers. A multispecies approach, inspired by ethology and biosemiotics, entanglement theory, and native ontologies, recognize that prehistoric communities were entwined with nonhumans in social as well as ecological and economic ways. We further embrace the concept of «egomorphism» (Milton 2005), a perspective acknowledging that humans perceive animals as similar to themselves and able to partake in social relations, as a viable road to overcome the polarization between Western and indigenous ontologies, while still taking native perspectives seriously. Archaeology is largely invisible in current debates about the Anthropocene and human influence on the environment. Although archaeological periods lie far beyond the onset of this geological epoch as currently defined, engaging with the debates encourages us to reflect on relations to nature and animals past and present, and our role and place in the world. Archaeological finds can challenge present norms and understandings and provide depth and diversity to the Anthropocene-debate which would not be accessible from anthropological, geographical or historical data. We welcome papers exploring multispecies relations from a variety of perspectives – relational, zoo/biosemiotic, ethological, historical, anthropological, environmental and phenomenological, regardless of chronological, geographical or cultural context. Contributions may focus on methods, models, case studies or theoretical frameworks.
PB  - Dublin : University College
T2  - "Living well together" Conferences on hunting and gathering societies 13, University college Dublin 2022 - conference sessions
T1  - Multispecies worlds and socio-centric societies – living together with animals, plants, and insects
SP  - 1
EP  - 1
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14351
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Mansrud, Anja and Windle, Morgan and Armstrong-Oma, Kristin and Živaljević, Ivana and Žakula, Sonja and Piezonka, Henny and Dudeck, Stephan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This session proposes multispecies approaches and understandings advanced within the ontological turn, as analytical frameworks for exploring how hunter-gatherers past and present were living (well?) with other species. Prehistoric archaeology, entailing the study of human and animal remains from the beginnings of humanity, on a global scale, can contribute in a unique way to explore what it means to be human in a world populated by non-human others. Throughout the Holocene humans have lived with animals in multispecies environments. How humans have lived with animals varies within, and between, societies. Animals have been bred, domesticated, buried, hunted, and fished, nurtured as pets and companions in addition to being exploited as food and materials. We also reflect on the role of insects as cultural agents, by focusing on how insects have impacted hunterfisher lifeways in the past and present, and what sort of challenges or solutions can insects represent to hunter-gatherers. A multispecies approach, inspired by ethology and biosemiotics, entanglement theory, and native ontologies, recognize that prehistoric communities were entwined with nonhumans in social as well as ecological and economic ways. We further embrace the concept of «egomorphism» (Milton 2005), a perspective acknowledging that humans perceive animals as similar to themselves and able to partake in social relations, as a viable road to overcome the polarization between Western and indigenous ontologies, while still taking native perspectives seriously. Archaeology is largely invisible in current debates about the Anthropocene and human influence on the environment. Although archaeological periods lie far beyond the onset of this geological epoch as currently defined, engaging with the debates encourages us to reflect on relations to nature and animals past and present, and our role and place in the world. Archaeological finds can challenge present norms and understandings and provide depth and diversity to the Anthropocene-debate which would not be accessible from anthropological, geographical or historical data. We welcome papers exploring multispecies relations from a variety of perspectives – relational, zoo/biosemiotic, ethological, historical, anthropological, environmental and phenomenological, regardless of chronological, geographical or cultural context. Contributions may focus on methods, models, case studies or theoretical frameworks.",
publisher = "Dublin : University College",
journal = ""Living well together" Conferences on hunting and gathering societies 13, University college Dublin 2022 - conference sessions",
title = "Multispecies worlds and socio-centric societies – living together with animals, plants, and insects",
pages = "1-1",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14351"
}

Mansrud, A., Windle, M., Armstrong-Oma, K., Živaljević, I., Žakula, S., Piezonka, H.,& Dudeck, S.. (2022). Multispecies worlds and socio-centric societies – living together with animals, plants, and insects. in "Living well together" Conferences on hunting and gathering societies 13, University college Dublin 2022 - conference sessions
Dublin : University College., 1-1.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14351

Mansrud A, Windle M, Armstrong-Oma K, Živaljević I, Žakula S, Piezonka H, Dudeck S. Multispecies worlds and socio-centric societies – living together with animals, plants, and insects. in "Living well together" Conferences on hunting and gathering societies 13, University college Dublin 2022 - conference sessions. 2022;:1-1.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14351 .

Mansrud, Anja, Windle, Morgan, Armstrong-Oma, Kristin, Živaljević, Ivana, Žakula, Sonja, Piezonka, Henny, Dudeck, Stephan, "Multispecies worlds and socio-centric societies – living together with animals, plants, and insects" in "Living well together" Conferences on hunting and gathering societies 13, University college Dublin 2022 - conference sessions (2022):1-1,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14351 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Žakula, Sonja
AU  - Živaljević, Ivana
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/4493
AB  - This paper is the first of the two planned, in which we will focus on the approaches to the
study of human-animal relations in ethnology and anthropology and archaeology. Even though interest in the role of animals in human societies is almost as old as the disciplines
the authors of this paper come from, changes and turbulences that the social sciences and the
humanities went through in the 1980’s meant that the old foundations on which this interest
was based came into question. Given the complexity and scope of the topic, the narrative on
the study of human-animal relations in anthropology and archaeology is divided into two
parts. In this first paper, we will offer a diachronic review of approaches to the study of
animals, animal remains and human-animal relations from the establishment of our
disciplines to approximately the end of the 20th century, and map changes and convergent
theoretical and methodological tendencies which have led to asking new and different
questions about relationships between humans and other animals, but also opened vast
possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration.
AB  - Овај текст представља први од планирана два чланка у којима ћемо се бавити
проблемом изучaвања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и
археологији. Иако је интересовање за улогу животиња у људским друштвима старо
готово колико и дисциплине из којих ауторке овог текста долазе, промене и
превирања кроз које су друштвене и хуманистичке науке пролазиле осамдесетих
година 20. века условиле су преиспитивање старих основа на којима је ово
интересовање у нашим дисциплинама почивало и, на ширем плану, довеле до
формирања новог интердисциплинарног поља проучавања људско-животињских
односа. Услед комплексности и обима обрађиване теме, прича о изучавању људско–
животињских односа у антропологији и археологији подељена је на два дела. У овом,
првом делу, понудићемо историјски осврт на приступе проучавaњу животиња,
животињских остатака и људско–животињских односа од заснивања наших
дисциплина до, угрубо, краја 20. века, и мапирати конвергентне теоријско-
методолошке тенденције у двема дисциплинама које су, напослетку, довеле до
постављања нових и другачијих питања у вези са односима између људи и других
животиња, али и отвориле низ могућности за интердисциплинарну сарадњу.
PB  - Beograd  : Etnografski institut SANU
T2  - Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA
T1  - Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I
SP  - 255
EP  - 270
VL  - 66
IS  - 2
DO  - 10.2298/GEI1802255Z
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Žakula, Sonja and Živaljević, Ivana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This paper is the first of the two planned, in which we will focus on the approaches to the
study of human-animal relations in ethnology and anthropology and archaeology. Even though interest in the role of animals in human societies is almost as old as the disciplines
the authors of this paper come from, changes and turbulences that the social sciences and the
humanities went through in the 1980’s meant that the old foundations on which this interest
was based came into question. Given the complexity and scope of the topic, the narrative on
the study of human-animal relations in anthropology and archaeology is divided into two
parts. In this first paper, we will offer a diachronic review of approaches to the study of
animals, animal remains and human-animal relations from the establishment of our
disciplines to approximately the end of the 20th century, and map changes and convergent
theoretical and methodological tendencies which have led to asking new and different
questions about relationships between humans and other animals, but also opened vast
possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration., Овај текст представља први од планирана два чланка у којима ћемо се бавити
проблемом изучaвања људско–животињских односа у етнологији и антропологији и
археологији. Иако је интересовање за улогу животиња у људским друштвима старо
готово колико и дисциплине из којих ауторке овог текста долазе, промене и
превирања кроз које су друштвене и хуманистичке науке пролазиле осамдесетих
година 20. века условиле су преиспитивање старих основа на којима је ово
интересовање у нашим дисциплинама почивало и, на ширем плану, довеле до
формирања новог интердисциплинарног поља проучавања људско-животињских
односа. Услед комплексности и обима обрађиване теме, прича о изучавању људско–
животињских односа у антропологији и археологији подељена је на два дела. У овом,
првом делу, понудићемо историјски осврт на приступе проучавaњу животиња,
животињских остатака и људско–животињских односа од заснивања наших
дисциплина до, угрубо, краја 20. века, и мапирати конвергентне теоријско-
методолошке тенденције у двема дисциплинама које су, напослетку, довеле до
постављања нових и другачијих питања у вези са односима између људи и других
животиња, али и отвориле низ могућности за интердисциплинарну сарадњу.",
publisher = "Beograd  : Etnografski institut SANU",
journal = "Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA",
title = "Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I",
pages = "255-270",
volume = "66",
number = "2",
doi = "10.2298/GEI1802255Z",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493"
}

Žakula, S.,& Živaljević, I.. (2018). Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I. in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA
Beograd  : Etnografski institut SANU., 66(2), 255-270.
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1802255Z
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493

Žakula S, Živaljević I. Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I. in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA. 2018;66(2):255-270.
doi:10.2298/GEI1802255Z
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493 .

Žakula, Sonja, Živaljević, Ivana, "Изучавање људско–животињских односа у антропологији и археологији I" in Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA, 66, no. 2 (2018):255-270,
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1802255Z .,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_4493 .