@article{
author = "Диковић, Јована and Ђорђевић Црнобрња, Јадранка",
year = "2013",
abstract = "У раду се анализира утицај
института дечјег додатка на
обликовање наследно-имовинских
односа током периода социјализма и
постсоцијализма. Упоредо се
сагледавају односи између појединаца
и појединих друштвених и државних
институција у два назначена периода, и
то кроз призму социоекономске
несигурности. У том смислу, у раду
показујемо на који начин појединци користе институт дечјег додатка као
стратегију за превазилажење несигурности. Показало се да услед
недовољне асистенције државних институција дечји додатак постаје
прагматична стратегија превазилажења несигурности. Уједно
закључујемо да постоји диспаритет између закона који се одосе на дечји
додатак и њихове примене у пракси, што отвара могућност да дечји
додатак утиче на регулисање наследно-имовинских односа., This paper analyzed how institution of
child benefit might be perceived as an indicator of
different social, political, economic and more
broad changes not only on individual but also on
general level. In that regard we traced
transformations of institution of child benefit
during socialism and post socialism, compared
how people perceived it and what kind of relations towards property it caused. These
two time frames are not taken randomly. On the contrary, they represent two different
systems as well as values. While socialist system introduced welfare state, where
individual security was transmitted to collective level, in post socialism individual
uncertainty has become dominant feature due to the rapid disintegration of the
institutions of social state.
In two different settings, Vranje and its nearby villages and in Gaj village, we
analyzed how child benefit shaped property relations, how persons perceived security
and uncertainty, and how they coped with uncertainty during these two periods.
Interestingly, in socialism people who moved from village to city and who were using
child benefit were not usually claimed right to parent`s land and were excluded from
inheritance. On the other hand – apart from the fact that in post socialism property
represents one of the main preconditions for exclusion from any social help and child
benefit as well – people who live in village apply different coping strategies in order to
secretly keep property and at the same time to claim child benefit even though they are
not eligible candidates.
We analyzed different examples of these coping strategies and argue that they
represent, in fact, dynamic and creative answer to “routinized state of crises” where
economic and political security and stability are missing at a state level.",
publisher = "Београд : Етнографски институт САНУ / Belgrade : Institute of Ethnography SASA",
journal = "Гласник Етнографског института САНУ / Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnography SASA",
title = "Сива зона закона и праксе: пример дечијег додатка, The Grey Zone of Law and Practice: an Example of Child Benefit",
pages = "91-106",
volume = "61",
number = "1",
doi = "10.2298/GEI1301091D",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_8231"
}
