Marksistička kritika studije Slobodana Jovanovića o Marksu : praksa i dijalektika
Marxist critiques of Slobodan Jovanovic’s study on Marx and Marxism: praxis and dialectic
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Slobodan Jovanović’s study on Marx (1935) has been interpreted and evaluated in every history of Serbian philosophy written after the Second World War (1968, 1972, 2002, 2009). This paper discusses Marxist responses to this study and the influence its evaluations had on the post-war reception and critique of Jovanović’s writings. The treatise on Marx, which came as a result of years of studying and keeping close track of the evolution of Marxism, Socialist thought and the labour movement, may also be seen as a Problem oriented history of Marxism. Jovanović suggests that essential to understanding Marx’s teaching is its philosophical contents because Marx’s findings in other areas were based on his philosophical insights. The paper also tackles the issue of interwar and post-war interpretations of the concept of praxis. Unlike his critics, what Jovanović understands by Marxism is not dialectical materialism. The paper shows that Marxist critiques of Jovanović’s study substantially influ...enced the philosophical reception of that work in the post-war period.
Кључне речи:
Slobodan Jovanović / Marx / history of philosophy / Marxism / praxis / dialectic / istorija filozofije / Hegel / Čedomir Kruševac / Veselin Masleša / Ognjen Prica / Otokar Keršovani / Dušan Nedeljković / Milovan Đilas / Feuerbach / Božidar S. Marković / slom kapitalizma / revolution / breakdown of capitalismИзвор:
Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society, 2013, 56, 3, 15-40Издавач:
- Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Историја политичких идеја и институција на Балкану у XIX и XX веку (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-177011)
Институција/група
Балканолошки институт САНУ / Institute for Balkan Studies SASATY - JOUR AU - Milosavljević, Boris PY - 2013 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/14974 AB - Slobodan Jovanović’s study on Marx (1935) has been interpreted and evaluated in every history of Serbian philosophy written after the Second World War (1968, 1972, 2002, 2009). This paper discusses Marxist responses to this study and the influence its evaluations had on the post-war reception and critique of Jovanović’s writings. The treatise on Marx, which came as a result of years of studying and keeping close track of the evolution of Marxism, Socialist thought and the labour movement, may also be seen as a Problem oriented history of Marxism. Jovanović suggests that essential to understanding Marx’s teaching is its philosophical contents because Marx’s findings in other areas were based on his philosophical insights. The paper also tackles the issue of interwar and post-war interpretations of the concept of praxis. Unlike his critics, what Jovanović understands by Marxism is not dialectical materialism. The paper shows that Marxist critiques of Jovanović’s study substantially influenced the philosophical reception of that work in the post-war period. PB - Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo T2 - Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society T1 - Marksistička kritika studije Slobodana Jovanovića o Marksu : praksa i dijalektika T1 - Marxist critiques of Slobodan Jovanovic’s study on Marx and Marxism: praxis and dialectic SP - 15 EP - 40 VL - 56 IS - 3 DO - 10.2298/THEO1303015M UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14974 ER -
@article{ author = "Milosavljević, Boris", year = "2013", abstract = "Slobodan Jovanović’s study on Marx (1935) has been interpreted and evaluated in every history of Serbian philosophy written after the Second World War (1968, 1972, 2002, 2009). This paper discusses Marxist responses to this study and the influence its evaluations had on the post-war reception and critique of Jovanović’s writings. The treatise on Marx, which came as a result of years of studying and keeping close track of the evolution of Marxism, Socialist thought and the labour movement, may also be seen as a Problem oriented history of Marxism. Jovanović suggests that essential to understanding Marx’s teaching is its philosophical contents because Marx’s findings in other areas were based on his philosophical insights. The paper also tackles the issue of interwar and post-war interpretations of the concept of praxis. Unlike his critics, what Jovanović understands by Marxism is not dialectical materialism. The paper shows that Marxist critiques of Jovanović’s study substantially influenced the philosophical reception of that work in the post-war period.", publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo", journal = "Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society", title = "Marksistička kritika studije Slobodana Jovanovića o Marksu : praksa i dijalektika, Marxist critiques of Slobodan Jovanovic’s study on Marx and Marxism: praxis and dialectic", pages = "15-40", volume = "56", number = "3", doi = "10.2298/THEO1303015M", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14974" }
Milosavljević, B.. (2013). Marksistička kritika studije Slobodana Jovanovića o Marksu : praksa i dijalektika. in Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 56(3), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1303015M https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14974
Milosavljević B. Marksistička kritika studije Slobodana Jovanovića o Marksu : praksa i dijalektika. in Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society. 2013;56(3):15-40. doi:10.2298/THEO1303015M https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14974 .
Milosavljević, Boris, "Marksistička kritika studije Slobodana Jovanovića o Marksu : praksa i dijalektika" in Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society, 56, no. 3 (2013):15-40, https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1303015M ., https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14974 .