Потенциал предлога для образования союзных средств
The Preposition Potential in Formation of Conjunctional Means
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
В статье рассматривается способность предлога образовать союз или его аналог. На материале русского языка с привлечением наблюдений автора над предлогами белорусского языка показывается механизм дено-минализации – трансформации морфологической формы в придаточную часть сложноподчиненного предложения. Показываются а) возможности и ограничения образования союзных средств на базе предлогов, б) влияние значения номинативного компонента синтаксем на образование союза, в) значимость управляющего слова в актантной структуре пред-ложения, г) зависимость образования союза от характера синтаксемы. Делается вывод, что методика трансформации предложно-именной синтаксемы в союзно-предикативную обнаруживает гораздо больше союзных средств, чем имеется в существующих грамматических и лексикографических описаниях.
In the article the ability of preposition to form conjunction or its equivalent has been considered. The mechanism of denominalization has been shown
on the Russian material with the involvement of the author’s observations on
prepositions in the Belarusian language — the morphological form transformation in to the subordinate part of complex sentence. The author’s conception 1s:
1) the syntaxeme is the actant position in the sentence; 2) the syntaxeme consists of the formant (preposition + flexion) and nominative component (substantive); 3) at the level of the complex sentence the same actant position may
take the predicative unit (subordinate part of the complex sentence); 4) the formant of the predicative syntaxeme in transforms 1s the conjunctional combination “preposition + demonstrative pronoun that + subordinate part conjunction”.
The preposition at case syntaxeme transformation in to predicative does
not change its function, but it is included in to the conjunctional fo...rmant as
one of the elements of more complex formant — conjunctional combination.
Each element of the conjunctional combination fulfills its function: the preposition still forms the syntaxeme, but with more complex nominative component
as predicative unit, the pronoun that is “flection™ of this nominative component
(subordinate part), and the conjunction acts as the explicator, providing grammatical connection of the nominative component of syntaxeme with the “flex1ion“ and the preposition.
It is noted that the mechanism and the results of denominalization depend
on the syntaxemes repertoire and character and on the preposition meaning:
the same preposition, with different meaning has different conyunctional potential. In to the mechanism of denominalization are involved categorematic names (classifiers), which initially are used as structural vocabulary for forming
secondary prepositions, and together with them, for forming conjunctional
combinations.
The methods of transformation of prepositional-nominal syntaxeme in to
conjunctional-predicative reveal more conjunctional means than there are in the
existing grammatical and lexicographical descriptions.
Keywords:
предлог / предлог / preposition / синтаксема / класификатор / формант / номинативна компонента / подређени члан / везник / показна заменица / актантна позиција / синтаксема / классификатор / формант / номинативный компонент / придаточная часть / союз / указательное местоимение / актантая позиция / syntaxeme / classifier / formant / nominative component / subordinate part / conjunction / demonstrative pronoun / actant positionSource:
Јужнословенски филолог, 2014, 70, 17-33Publisher:
- Београд : Институт за српски језик
- Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
Collections
Institution/Community
Институт за српски језик САНУ / Institute for the Serbian Language of SASATY - JOUR AU - Конюшкевич, Мария И. PY - 2014 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/6406 AB - В статье рассматривается способность предлога образовать союз или его аналог. На материале русского языка с привлечением наблюдений автора над предлогами белорусского языка показывается механизм дено-минализации – трансформации морфологической формы в придаточную часть сложноподчиненного предложения. Показываются а) возможности и ограничения образования союзных средств на базе предлогов, б) влияние значения номинативного компонента синтаксем на образование союза, в) значимость управляющего слова в актантной структуре пред-ложения, г) зависимость образования союза от характера синтаксемы. Делается вывод, что методика трансформации предложно-именной синтаксемы в союзно-предикативную обнаруживает гораздо больше союзных средств, чем имеется в существующих грамматических и лексикографических описаниях. AB - In the article the ability of preposition to form conjunction or its equivalent has been considered. The mechanism of denominalization has been shown on the Russian material with the involvement of the author’s observations on prepositions in the Belarusian language — the morphological form transformation in to the subordinate part of complex sentence. The author’s conception 1s: 1) the syntaxeme is the actant position in the sentence; 2) the syntaxeme consists of the formant (preposition + flexion) and nominative component (substantive); 3) at the level of the complex sentence the same actant position may take the predicative unit (subordinate part of the complex sentence); 4) the formant of the predicative syntaxeme in transforms 1s the conjunctional combination “preposition + demonstrative pronoun that + subordinate part conjunction”. The preposition at case syntaxeme transformation in to predicative does not change its function, but it is included in to the conjunctional formant as one of the elements of more complex formant — conjunctional combination. Each element of the conjunctional combination fulfills its function: the preposition still forms the syntaxeme, but with more complex nominative component as predicative unit, the pronoun that is “flection™ of this nominative component (subordinate part), and the conjunction acts as the explicator, providing grammatical connection of the nominative component of syntaxeme with the “flex1ion“ and the preposition. It is noted that the mechanism and the results of denominalization depend on the syntaxemes repertoire and character and on the preposition meaning: the same preposition, with different meaning has different conyunctional potential. In to the mechanism of denominalization are involved categorematic names (classifiers), which initially are used as structural vocabulary for forming secondary prepositions, and together with them, for forming conjunctional combinations. The methods of transformation of prepositional-nominal syntaxeme in to conjunctional-predicative reveal more conjunctional means than there are in the existing grammatical and lexicographical descriptions. PB - Београд : Институт за српски језик PB - Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности T2 - Јужнословенски филолог T1 - Потенциал предлога для образования союзных средств T1 - The Preposition Potential in Formation of Conjunctional Means SP - 17 EP - 33 VL - 70 DO - 10.2298/JFI1470017K UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6406 ER -
@article{ author = "Конюшкевич, Мария И.", year = "2014", abstract = "В статье рассматривается способность предлога образовать союз или его аналог. На материале русского языка с привлечением наблюдений автора над предлогами белорусского языка показывается механизм дено-минализации – трансформации морфологической формы в придаточную часть сложноподчиненного предложения. Показываются а) возможности и ограничения образования союзных средств на базе предлогов, б) влияние значения номинативного компонента синтаксем на образование союза, в) значимость управляющего слова в актантной структуре пред-ложения, г) зависимость образования союза от характера синтаксемы. Делается вывод, что методика трансформации предложно-именной синтаксемы в союзно-предикативную обнаруживает гораздо больше союзных средств, чем имеется в существующих грамматических и лексикографических описаниях., In the article the ability of preposition to form conjunction or its equivalent has been considered. The mechanism of denominalization has been shown on the Russian material with the involvement of the author’s observations on prepositions in the Belarusian language — the morphological form transformation in to the subordinate part of complex sentence. The author’s conception 1s: 1) the syntaxeme is the actant position in the sentence; 2) the syntaxeme consists of the formant (preposition + flexion) and nominative component (substantive); 3) at the level of the complex sentence the same actant position may take the predicative unit (subordinate part of the complex sentence); 4) the formant of the predicative syntaxeme in transforms 1s the conjunctional combination “preposition + demonstrative pronoun that + subordinate part conjunction”. The preposition at case syntaxeme transformation in to predicative does not change its function, but it is included in to the conjunctional formant as one of the elements of more complex formant — conjunctional combination. Each element of the conjunctional combination fulfills its function: the preposition still forms the syntaxeme, but with more complex nominative component as predicative unit, the pronoun that is “flection™ of this nominative component (subordinate part), and the conjunction acts as the explicator, providing grammatical connection of the nominative component of syntaxeme with the “flex1ion“ and the preposition. It is noted that the mechanism and the results of denominalization depend on the syntaxemes repertoire and character and on the preposition meaning: the same preposition, with different meaning has different conyunctional potential. In to the mechanism of denominalization are involved categorematic names (classifiers), which initially are used as structural vocabulary for forming secondary prepositions, and together with them, for forming conjunctional combinations. The methods of transformation of prepositional-nominal syntaxeme in to conjunctional-predicative reveal more conjunctional means than there are in the existing grammatical and lexicographical descriptions.", publisher = "Београд : Институт за српски језик, Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности", journal = "Јужнословенски филолог", title = "Потенциал предлога для образования союзных средств, The Preposition Potential in Formation of Conjunctional Means", pages = "17-33", volume = "70", doi = "10.2298/JFI1470017K", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6406" }
Конюшкевич, М. И.. (2014). Потенциал предлога для образования союзных средств. in Јужнословенски филолог Београд : Институт за српски језик., 70, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI1470017K https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6406
Конюшкевич МИ. Потенциал предлога для образования союзных средств. in Јужнословенски филолог. 2014;70:17-33. doi:10.2298/JFI1470017K https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6406 .
Конюшкевич, Мария И., "Потенциал предлога для образования союзных средств" in Јужнословенски филолог, 70 (2014):17-33, https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI1470017K ., https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_6406 .