Show simple item record

dc.creatorTheodorescu, Răzvan
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T11:33:08Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T11:33:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0350-7653
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=751659
dc.identifier.urihttp://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/6114
dc.description.abstractIn the last century nationalism as a spiritual element – according to the 1919 statement of the historian, archaeologist and philosopher Vasile Pârvan – was a blessed plant grown on Romanian soil during the ’48 revolution, the ’59 union under Prince Cuza, the ’77 war of independence and the preparation of such a national project as the Union with the Romanian Kingdom of several Romanian-speaking provinces dominated by two empires – the Austrian and the Russian – epitomized by Transylvania which came finally to the motherland on the 1st of December 1918, the same day when the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was born. In the nationalism project, the Union Transylvania was a political priority. But we must add immediately that in the events of 1914–1916 in the neighbourhood of Romania a symbol of the national struggle became what Nicolae Iorga, in a famous lecture of 1915,called “the heroic and martyr Serbia".en
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBelgrade : Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceBalcanica
dc.subjectnationalismen
dc.subjectRomania
dc.subjectTransylvania
dc.subjectNicolae Iorga
dc.titleWhat Exactly did Romanian Post-War Nationalism Mean
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractТхеодоресцу, Рăзван;
dc.citation.spage183
dc.citation.epage188
dc.citation.issueXLIX
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/BALC1849183T
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://dais.sanu.ac.rs/bitstream/id/18931/13 Răzvan Theodorescu, What Exactly did Romanian Post-War Nationalism Mean.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record