О „денотативном“ и „конотативном“ карактеризовању
On “Denotational“ And „Connotational“ Characterization
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The author calls attention to whetheoretical werest of looking at the nature of
language devices like Serbo-Croatian pravi of English real which serve to signalize that H is a shiming example of Y. Adressing the question of how the assignment of the distinguishing properties of Y to Htakes place, she points to the fact that there
is good reason for a clear distinction between two prototypical characterizations
of non-identical provenience, denotational characterization being related to the
denotational features of Y, an conpotational characterization to the connotational
ones. She brings to light some theoretically relevant asprects of this distinction.
In exploring the occurence of prototypicality determiners in languages, the ex
planatory usefulness of the perspectivization principle comes to evidence. Namely,
the assignment of the prototype status to H being a complex notion, speakers may
choose one particular aspect of it as more salient than the others and focus on it.
T...hus, depending on communication context, the prototypicality determiner may
funcion either asqualifier (in cases when denotational / connotational characteriza
tion is being concerned) or as truth-value modifier (sf English real understood in
the sense of not false). Languages differ as to the possibility of signaling overtly
the angle from which the prototypicality ofH has to be viewed. The author brings
evidence for this by contrasting corresponding Serbo-Croatian and English data.
As a topic for further research, the author mentions the obvious need for a
better understanding of the interaction of three factors under which influence our
mental images of „prototypes“ have been shaped: (1) our perception and knowledge
of „objective reality“, (2) our expectations, and (3) our beliefs an prejudices.
Source:
Јужнословенски филолог, 1992, 48, 1-11Publisher:
- Београд : Институт за српскохрватски језик
Collections
Institution/Community
Институт за српски језик САНУ / Institute for the Serbian Language of SASATY - JOUR AU - Ивић, Милка PY - 1992 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/5928 AB - The author calls attention to whetheoretical werest of looking at the nature of language devices like Serbo-Croatian pravi of English real which serve to signalize that H is a shiming example of Y. Adressing the question of how the assignment of the distinguishing properties of Y to Htakes place, she points to the fact that there is good reason for a clear distinction between two prototypical characterizations of non-identical provenience, denotational characterization being related to the denotational features of Y, an conpotational characterization to the connotational ones. She brings to light some theoretically relevant asprects of this distinction. In exploring the occurence of prototypicality determiners in languages, the ex planatory usefulness of the perspectivization principle comes to evidence. Namely, the assignment of the prototype status to H being a complex notion, speakers may choose one particular aspect of it as more salient than the others and focus on it. Thus, depending on communication context, the prototypicality determiner may funcion either asqualifier (in cases when denotational / connotational characteriza tion is being concerned) or as truth-value modifier (sf English real understood in the sense of not false). Languages differ as to the possibility of signaling overtly the angle from which the prototypicality ofH has to be viewed. The author brings evidence for this by contrasting corresponding Serbo-Croatian and English data. As a topic for further research, the author mentions the obvious need for a better understanding of the interaction of three factors under which influence our mental images of „prototypes“ have been shaped: (1) our perception and knowledge of „objective reality“, (2) our expectations, and (3) our beliefs an prejudices. PB - Београд : Институт за српскохрватски језик T2 - Јужнословенски филолог T1 - О „денотативном“ и „конотативном“ карактеризовању T1 - On “Denotational“ And „Connotational“ Characterization SP - 1 EP - 11 VL - 48 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_5928 ER -
@article{ author = "Ивић, Милка", year = "1992", abstract = "The author calls attention to whetheoretical werest of looking at the nature of language devices like Serbo-Croatian pravi of English real which serve to signalize that H is a shiming example of Y. Adressing the question of how the assignment of the distinguishing properties of Y to Htakes place, she points to the fact that there is good reason for a clear distinction between two prototypical characterizations of non-identical provenience, denotational characterization being related to the denotational features of Y, an conpotational characterization to the connotational ones. She brings to light some theoretically relevant asprects of this distinction. In exploring the occurence of prototypicality determiners in languages, the ex planatory usefulness of the perspectivization principle comes to evidence. Namely, the assignment of the prototype status to H being a complex notion, speakers may choose one particular aspect of it as more salient than the others and focus on it. Thus, depending on communication context, the prototypicality determiner may funcion either asqualifier (in cases when denotational / connotational characteriza tion is being concerned) or as truth-value modifier (sf English real understood in the sense of not false). Languages differ as to the possibility of signaling overtly the angle from which the prototypicality ofH has to be viewed. The author brings evidence for this by contrasting corresponding Serbo-Croatian and English data. As a topic for further research, the author mentions the obvious need for a better understanding of the interaction of three factors under which influence our mental images of „prototypes“ have been shaped: (1) our perception and knowledge of „objective reality“, (2) our expectations, and (3) our beliefs an prejudices.", publisher = "Београд : Институт за српскохрватски језик", journal = "Јужнословенски филолог", title = "О „денотативном“ и „конотативном“ карактеризовању, On “Denotational“ And „Connotational“ Characterization", pages = "1-11", volume = "48", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_5928" }
Ивић, М.. (1992). О „денотативном“ и „конотативном“ карактеризовању. in Јужнословенски филолог Београд : Институт за српскохрватски језик., 48, 1-11. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_5928
Ивић М. О „денотативном“ и „конотативном“ карактеризовању. in Јужнословенски филолог. 1992;48:1-11. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_5928 .
Ивић, Милка, "О „денотативном“ и „конотативном“ карактеризовању" in Јужнословенски филолог, 48 (1992):1-11, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_5928 .