Polemika Alimpija Vasiljevića i Milana Kujundžića Aberdara (1865–1873)
A debate between Alimpije Vasiljević and Milan Kujundžić Aberdar (1865-1873)
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
In his lauding review of Dimitrije Matić’s (1821-1884) History of Philosophy (largely based on А. Schwegler), published in 1865 in the journal Vila, started and edited by Stojan Novaković (1842-1915), Alimpije Vasiljević (1831-1911) assessed the pattern of the book as one of the latest and best in the field. In his critical reaction to Vasiljević’s review, Milan Kujundžić (1842-1893) challenged his assessment. For the generation of the United Serbian Youth, Hegelianism was unacceptable for two reasons: because of increasingly influential positivism (naturalism) and scientism, and because of the strengthening of the ideology of Greater Germany with which it was equated. Both Vasiljević and Kujundžic were liberals. Their debate, however, was harsh and long, and the intellectual public followed it with “particular attention”. They polemicized about, inter alia, the actual philosophical relevance of the issue of idealism vs. materialism. Even though the debate showed inconsistencies and co...ntradictions in argumentation, it led to independence in problem formulation and solving.
Кључне речи:
criticism / philosophical debate / Milan Kujundžić / Alimpije Vasiljević / idealism / materialism / philosophical terminology / phenomenology / multidisciplinarity / filozofska debata / filozofska terminologija / idealizam / materijalizam / fenomenologija / Dimitrije MatićИзвор:
Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society, 2018, 61, 3, 143-167Издавач:
- Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Историја политичких идеја и институција на Балкану у XIX и XX веку (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-177011)
Институција/група
Балканолошки институт САНУ / Institute for Balkan Studies SASATY - JOUR AU - Milosavljević, Boris PY - 2018 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/14951 AB - In his lauding review of Dimitrije Matić’s (1821-1884) History of Philosophy (largely based on А. Schwegler), published in 1865 in the journal Vila, started and edited by Stojan Novaković (1842-1915), Alimpije Vasiljević (1831-1911) assessed the pattern of the book as one of the latest and best in the field. In his critical reaction to Vasiljević’s review, Milan Kujundžić (1842-1893) challenged his assessment. For the generation of the United Serbian Youth, Hegelianism was unacceptable for two reasons: because of increasingly influential positivism (naturalism) and scientism, and because of the strengthening of the ideology of Greater Germany with which it was equated. Both Vasiljević and Kujundžic were liberals. Their debate, however, was harsh and long, and the intellectual public followed it with “particular attention”. They polemicized about, inter alia, the actual philosophical relevance of the issue of idealism vs. materialism. Even though the debate showed inconsistencies and contradictions in argumentation, it led to independence in problem formulation and solving. PB - Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo T2 - Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society T1 - Polemika Alimpija Vasiljevića i Milana Kujundžića Aberdara (1865–1873) T1 - A debate between Alimpije Vasiljević and Milan Kujundžić Aberdar (1865-1873) SP - 143 EP - 167 VL - 61 IS - 3 DO - 10.2298/THEO1803143M UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14951 ER -
@article{ author = "Milosavljević, Boris", year = "2018", abstract = "In his lauding review of Dimitrije Matić’s (1821-1884) History of Philosophy (largely based on А. Schwegler), published in 1865 in the journal Vila, started and edited by Stojan Novaković (1842-1915), Alimpije Vasiljević (1831-1911) assessed the pattern of the book as one of the latest and best in the field. In his critical reaction to Vasiljević’s review, Milan Kujundžić (1842-1893) challenged his assessment. For the generation of the United Serbian Youth, Hegelianism was unacceptable for two reasons: because of increasingly influential positivism (naturalism) and scientism, and because of the strengthening of the ideology of Greater Germany with which it was equated. Both Vasiljević and Kujundžic were liberals. Their debate, however, was harsh and long, and the intellectual public followed it with “particular attention”. They polemicized about, inter alia, the actual philosophical relevance of the issue of idealism vs. materialism. Even though the debate showed inconsistencies and contradictions in argumentation, it led to independence in problem formulation and solving.", publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo", journal = "Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society", title = "Polemika Alimpija Vasiljevića i Milana Kujundžića Aberdara (1865–1873), A debate between Alimpije Vasiljević and Milan Kujundžić Aberdar (1865-1873)", pages = "143-167", volume = "61", number = "3", doi = "10.2298/THEO1803143M", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14951" }
Milosavljević, B.. (2018). Polemika Alimpija Vasiljevića i Milana Kujundžića Aberdara (1865–1873). in Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 61(3), 143-167. https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1803143M https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14951
Milosavljević B. Polemika Alimpija Vasiljevića i Milana Kujundžića Aberdara (1865–1873). in Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society. 2018;61(3):143-167. doi:10.2298/THEO1803143M https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14951 .
Milosavljević, Boris, "Polemika Alimpija Vasiljevića i Milana Kujundžića Aberdara (1865–1873)" in Theoria : časopis Srpskog filozofskog društva / Theoria : Journal of the Serbian Philosophical Society, 61, no. 3 (2018):143-167, https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1803143M ., https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_14951 .