Босна и Херцеговина и Сарајевски атентат у британској штампи (29. јун – 2. јул 1914)
Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Sarajevo аssassination in the British press (29 June – 2 July 1914)
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
The paper explores the way in which the British press perceived Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Sarajevo assassination in the several key days after this event. The leading British papers of different political affiliation considered the population of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, despite all religious differences and divisions, ethnic Serbs. Although they
transmitted the accusations from Vienna and Pest, the British papers were attributing the
Sarajevo assassination also to the political repression and material stagnation of Bosnia
and Herzegovina under Austria-Hungary. The British public opinion had only the words of condemnation for the assassinators, but did not have much sympathy for Franz Ferdinand either. It devoted considerable attention to the anti-Serbian pogroms which, immediately after the assassination, engulfed Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In continuation
of the crisis, particularly after the ultimatum of 23 July, the attention of the British press
shifted from Bosn...ia and Herzegovina to Serbia. The differences in the attitude of liberal
and conservative papers to the Balkan crisis were becoming increasingly more pronounced.
The liberals held their anti-Russian and anti-Serbian attitude, while, although the liberal
government ruled the country, the conservatives’ assessment prevailed that Britain’s main
enemy at the moment was after all Germany.
Кључне речи:
British press / Bosnia and Herzegovina / Franz Ferdinand / Sarajevo assassination / British public opinion / liberal papers / conservative papersИзвор:
Глас САНУ, 2018, 428, 363-373Издавач:
- Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности
Напомена:
- Глас / Српска академија наука и уметности ; 428. Одељење историјских наука ; књ.18
TY - JOUR AU - Ковић, Милош PY - 2018 UR - https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/123456789/9105 AB - The paper explores the way in which the British press perceived Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Sarajevo assassination in the several key days after this event. The leading British papers of different political affiliation considered the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina, despite all religious differences and divisions, ethnic Serbs. Although they transmitted the accusations from Vienna and Pest, the British papers were attributing the Sarajevo assassination also to the political repression and material stagnation of Bosnia and Herzegovina under Austria-Hungary. The British public opinion had only the words of condemnation for the assassinators, but did not have much sympathy for Franz Ferdinand either. It devoted considerable attention to the anti-Serbian pogroms which, immediately after the assassination, engulfed Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In continuation of the crisis, particularly after the ultimatum of 23 July, the attention of the British press shifted from Bosnia and Herzegovina to Serbia. The differences in the attitude of liberal and conservative papers to the Balkan crisis were becoming increasingly more pronounced. The liberals held their anti-Russian and anti-Serbian attitude, while, although the liberal government ruled the country, the conservatives’ assessment prevailed that Britain’s main enemy at the moment was after all Germany. PB - Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности T2 - Глас САНУ T1 - Босна и Херцеговина и Сарајевски атентат у британској штампи (29. јун – 2. јул 1914) T1 - Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Sarajevo аssassination in the British press (29 June – 2 July 1914) SP - 363 EP - 373 VL - 428 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9105 ER -
@article{ author = "Ковић, Милош", year = "2018", abstract = "The paper explores the way in which the British press perceived Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Sarajevo assassination in the several key days after this event. The leading British papers of different political affiliation considered the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina, despite all religious differences and divisions, ethnic Serbs. Although they transmitted the accusations from Vienna and Pest, the British papers were attributing the Sarajevo assassination also to the political repression and material stagnation of Bosnia and Herzegovina under Austria-Hungary. The British public opinion had only the words of condemnation for the assassinators, but did not have much sympathy for Franz Ferdinand either. It devoted considerable attention to the anti-Serbian pogroms which, immediately after the assassination, engulfed Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In continuation of the crisis, particularly after the ultimatum of 23 July, the attention of the British press shifted from Bosnia and Herzegovina to Serbia. The differences in the attitude of liberal and conservative papers to the Balkan crisis were becoming increasingly more pronounced. The liberals held their anti-Russian and anti-Serbian attitude, while, although the liberal government ruled the country, the conservatives’ assessment prevailed that Britain’s main enemy at the moment was after all Germany.", publisher = "Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности", journal = "Глас САНУ", title = "Босна и Херцеговина и Сарајевски атентат у британској штампи (29. јун – 2. јул 1914), Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Sarajevo аssassination in the British press (29 June – 2 July 1914)", pages = "363-373", volume = "428", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9105" }
Ковић, М.. (2018). Босна и Херцеговина и Сарајевски атентат у британској штампи (29. јун – 2. јул 1914). in Глас САНУ Београд : Српска академија наука и уметности., 428, 363-373. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9105
Ковић М. Босна и Херцеговина и Сарајевски атентат у британској штампи (29. јун – 2. јул 1914). in Глас САНУ. 2018;428:363-373. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9105 .
Ковић, Милош, "Босна и Херцеговина и Сарајевски атентат у британској штампи (29. јун – 2. јул 1914)" in Глас САНУ, 428 (2018):363-373, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_9105 .